|
2011-05-17
, 17:23
|
Posts: 433 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#2
|
|
2011-05-17
, 20:12
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 99 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ India
|
#3
|
|
2011-05-18
, 11:48
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Holland
|
#4
|
can't answer your question - but if worst comes to worst, at least openVPN's in the repo's :-)
|
2011-05-18
, 12:13
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#5
|
|
2011-05-18
, 12:26
|
Posts: 433 |
Thanked: 274 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#6
|
I found out that VPN is used to send encrypted data from machine to router to recieving router to recieving machine and vice-versa. I was talking mainly about the mobile internet, that often does not require a single router. For example: use wireless internet to skype a bud on his iphone whilse he is on a mobile network as well.
At home and some other places I autoconnect to the wifi so that will not pose a prob any time soon, but i'd hate to be restricted whilse on the road..
|
2011-05-19
, 08:38
|
Posts: 307 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Jul 2009
@ Illinois, USA
|
#7
|
As I've noticed, telcos usually sell more than what they gave (e.g. 2mbit line down speed and 100 subscribers, but they only have a 1Gbps pipe.) Sure there are the sheeple that browse Facebook, Twitter etc. all day, and there are the heavy downloaders that max out their connection all day, erryday. That's not an exuse to oversell, and ***** that it's too expensive to run the network. Their network should be able to handle all the users maxing out the up and down, and then some.
|
2011-07-24
, 07:43
|
|
Posts: 279 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Holland
|
#8
|
Some carriers in Holland have admitted the usage of DPI (deep packet inspection), a technology wich makes it possible for them to view usage and content of your mobile internet. For example, they can see that you use msn and even the content of the messages you send. It is not sure wether this is in violation with local laws, but I do know that multiple individuals already put up a claim against KPN for violation of privacy, and that independent organisation "Bits of Freedom" is advising to do the same.
This isn't even the most worrying part for me. They admitted usage of this technology to monitor what we use the internet for, so that they can bill their users extra fees in the near future, for using some internet services like skype, msn, whatsapp and so on. Or block these services, when you don't have the required internet bundle. This means that by summer time when they will announce new forms of bundles, the usage of skype and possibly some other services will (most likely, if they stick to their plans) be blocked for me by my provider.
Isn't that insane, billing me for a free service? In my opinion the web is mine to be used for what I want as long as I am paying for it, wich we all do when we have mobile internet included in our contract.
My worries are also with you, who knows other carriers like yours in the US for example are not using this DPI technology, having the same intentions as mentioned above? And if they get away with this, probably more carriers will follow.
Some sources: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...ming-video.ars
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/12/d...itor-mobile-c/
http://maandblad.arsaequi.nl/opinie/.../weblog_041103
Thank you for your time in advance
Is that a N900 in your pants or are you just happy to see me?