Ubuntu 12.04 on N900 with U-Boot - Page 16 - maemo.org

Active Topics

Firefox with Leste (5)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 12 hrs ago
Handbook (2)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 4 days, 12 hrs ago
more...

Page 16 of 45

Thread Tools

unknown.obvious	2012-04-21 , 17:56
Posts: 58 \| Thanked: 197 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#151

Originally Posted by freemangordon

Could you give me a hint where the kernel source is located, sorry for the dumb question

http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-dev...on/n900_kernel

Quote & Reply |

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to unknown.obvious For This Useful Post:
Estel, freemangordon, fw190, ivyking, nkirk, szopin

freemangordon	2012-04-21 , 18:07
Posts: 3,074 \| Thanked: 12,960 times \| Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria	#152

Originally Posted by unknown.obvious

http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-dev...on/n900_kernel

here

:

https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-de...mmc.c#line2079

EDIT:
scratch that, wont work

Last edited by freemangordon; 2012-04-21 at 18:15.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
Estel, fw190, ivyking, nkirk, szopin

unknown.obvious	2012-04-21 , 18:16
Posts: 58 \| Thanked: 197 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#153

Originally Posted by freemangordon

here :

https://meego.gitorious.org/meego-de...mmc.c#line2079

ok. changed. Starting compilation.

EDIT:

EDIT:
scratch that, wont work

Ok. Stoped compilation

Last edited by unknown.obvious; 2012-04-21 at 18:19.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to unknown.obvious For This Useful Post:
Estel, freemangordon, fw190, ivyking, nkirk, szopin

unknown.obvious	2012-04-22 , 07:08
Posts: 58 \| Thanked: 197 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#154

New Package but nothing exciting.

Just some cosmetic changes. Like -n900 instead of -custom. Still armel and not armhf, sorry. Source Package is inside.

MD5SUM: fae2bd7fecc96b21e40f3f13e00d441d kernel_n900.tar.gz

84 Mb - http://www.2shared.com/file/aaTbk2uI...l_n900tar.html (2shared)

Mirror - https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B__R...VxVEhZa3c/edit (googledocs)

Code:

make-kpkg --rootcmd=fakeroot --revision=0 \
   --append-to-version=-n900 --arch=armel \
   --cross-compile=/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf- kernel-image kernel_headers kernel_source modules --initrd

Does someone know how to use Launchpad.net for armel (armhf) Packages?

Last edited by unknown.obvious; 2012-05-25 at 21:35.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to unknown.obvious For This Useful Post:
Estel, fw190, int_ua, ivyking, nkirk, PanzerSajt, Sourav.dubey, szopin

pali	2012-04-22 , 11:03
Posts: 2,153 \| Thanked: 8,462 times \| Joined on May 2010	#155

Originally Posted by unknown.obvious

Does someone know how to use Launchpad.net for armel (armhf) Packages?

Do you mean launchpad PPA archives?
Public PPAs are only for i386 and amd64 builds. Normal user cannot create armel PPA

Quote & Reply |

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to pali For This Useful Post:
don_falcone, fw190, int_ua, ivyking, nkirk, Sourav.dubey, szopin, unknown.obvious

unknown.obvious	2012-04-22 , 14:41
Posts: 58 \| Thanked: 197 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#156

Originally Posted by pali

Do you mean launchpad PPA archives?
Public PPAs are only for i386 and amd64 builds. Normal user cannot create armel PPA

I see, public accounts can't. Yes I meant PPA archives. Thank you

Quote & Reply |

	int_ua	2012-04-25 , 22:07
	Posts: 676 \| Thanked: 1,067 times \| Joined on Jul 2010 @ Kyiv, Ukraine	#157

Originally Posted by unknown.obvious

I'll try some more stuff with ubuntu. If it doesn't work, let's try to build a hardware pack for n900 the linaro way: https://wiki.linaro.org/HowTo

Interesting, thanks

Originally Posted by unknown.obvious

Also elevator=noop in boot.scr.... I am also not sure about that.

I'm not sure either

Can you provide any reason to exclude it?

Originally Posted by ivyking

3) the script executes bash even if a non custom kernel (nemo) is selected, and the user is not prompted that he needs to type "exit" to continue.

Are you sure it's not alien or dpkg failire? Can you please provide more details?

Originally Posted by ivyking

4) if the user chooses the old ubuntu kernel, the resulting uInitrd is corrupt , u-boot will stop booting because of this.

Again, what makes you sure about that? Can you say why that happens?

Originally Posted by ivyking

1) find and replace (--no-log) with ("-"\- "--no-log") without the brackets of course.

Can you make a patch after editig the script with

Code:

$ bzr diff > ivykings_patch.patch

Quote & Reply |

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to int_ua For This Useful Post:
ivyking, Sourav.dubey, szopin

ivyking	2012-04-26 , 00:19
Posts: 237 \| Thanked: 274 times \| Joined on Jul 2010	#158

Originally Posted by int_ua

Interesting, thanks

I'm not sure either Can you provide any reason to exclude it?

Are you sure it's not alien or dpkg failire? Can you please provide more details?

Again, what makes you sure about that? Can you say why that happens?

Can you make a patch after editig the script with
Code:
$ bzr diff > ivykings_patch.patch
?

attached is a patch against rev 77 which just changes 3 lines..

[edit 2]

I re-uploaded the patch after removing || exit 1 from line 304 in install.sh as the selected kernel may not have an associated uInitrd, the script will exit without completing even if nothing has gone wrong.

Attached Files

patch1.patch.txt (2.5 KB, 101 views)

Last edited by ivyking; 2012-04-26 at 12:36.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ivyking For This Useful Post:
int_ua, Sourav.dubey, szopin

unknown.obvious	2012-04-26 , 12:07
Posts: 58 \| Thanked: 197 times \| Joined on Apr 2012	#159

Originally Posted by int_ua

Interesting, thanks

you're welcome

Originally Posted by int_ua

I'm not sure either Can you provide any reason to exclude it?

No, not really. That's why I didn't press the issue. I am aware that noop sheduler use less cpu then cfq or deadline but there is somewhere a RedHead comparission floating around the Internet, saying that that other sheduler have only little cpu more strain but better I/O throughput. The n900 is no PC so would this matter?

There have also been a more recent disscussion on LKML about the default cfq and that deadline would be better on non-spinning storage. Talking about fast non-spinning storage devices and is sdhc class 6-10 deadline "fast" or cfq "slow" to improve?

Lastly I am not so sure about the driver quality of sdcard and emmc in the "old" kernel versions we use.

Unless we do a real Benchmack and stability Test, we wouldn't really know. So I see no reason to say no to noop but still nor sure.

Quote & Reply |

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to unknown.obvious For This Useful Post:
int_ua, ivyking, Sourav.dubey, szopin

ivyking	2012-04-26 , 21:25
Posts: 237 \| Thanked: 274 times \| Joined on Jul 2010	#160

Originally Posted by unknown.obvious

New Package but nothing exciting.

Just some cosmetic changes. Like -n900 instead of -custom. Still armel and not armhf, sorry. Source Package is inside.

MD5SUM: fae2bd7fecc96b21e40f3f13e00d441d kernel_n900.tar.gz

84 Mb - http://www.2shared.com/file/aaTbk2uI...l_n900tar.html

Does someone know how to use Launchpad.net for armel (armhf) Packages?

can you upload the package somewhere else ? clicking the download button simply redirects to 2shared home page..

google docs (you can upload any file there not just documents) or box.com are friendly enough.