Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 15 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Finland
#11
It's perfectly possible to have packages built for PR1.1 in the SDK. Just install the qt4-maemo5-* packages from extras-devel and use
Code:
/opt/qt4-maemo5/bin/qmake
to configure. After PR1.2 is out just switch to /usr/bin/qmake and you'll use the default libs.

Is there anything else one should do really?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jkyro For This Useful Post:
noobmonkey's Avatar
Posts: 3,203 | Thanked: 1,391 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Worthing, England
#12
Originally Posted by jkyro View Post
It's perfectly possible to have packages built for PR1.1 in the SDK. Just install the qt4-maemo5-* packages from extras-devel and use
Code:
/opt/qt4-maemo5/bin/qmake
to configure. After PR1.2 is out just switch to /usr/bin/qmake and you'll use the default libs.

Is there anything else one should do really?
qmake?

Sorry no idea what you are on about
If it is something everyone can use, i'd really recommend someone explaining it and putting it on the wiki
__________________
----------- Follow me on Twitter here
----------- My Photography Website and Blog is here
----------- Author of the N900 Health Check Application ----------- New Version in Extras Devel (Dec 2010 - 2.9.10)
----------- Are you on the N900 World Map? - http://pininthemap.com/maemo - masterpin: shotgun
----------- What apps do you want to see on the n900 or in MeeGo in the future? -
 
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#13
Originally Posted by noobmonkey View Post
the version of healthcheck in devel and extras is not dependent on 4.6 - i'm holding back uploading any new versions at the moment - would assume it was something else pythony related? :P
Most likely the extras-devel version of PyQt, that one is for PR1.2
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following User Says Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 50 | Thanked: 45 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ France
#14
Thanks a lot for this post.

I have some question about this :

There is no side effect to do this ?

App who need Qt 4.5.3 still working ?

Before to do ' apt-get upgrade' , I need to disable the SDK repo ?
 
Venemo's Avatar
Posts: 1,296 | Thanked: 1,773 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Budapest, Hungary
#15
Originally Posted by mymybib View Post
There is no side effect to do this ?
None that I know of.

Originally Posted by mymybib View Post
App who need Qt 4.5.3 still working ?
As far as I know, yes.
(There is something about a binary compatibility promise on Qt's site, but I'm not sure if it applies here.)

Originally Posted by mymybib View Post
Before to do ' apt-get upgrade' , I need to disable the SDK repo ?
Yes. As I wrote, it will brick your device if you upgrade more stuff from it. (It did brick Andy1210's device.)

Hope this helps!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Venemo For This Useful Post:
OranAgra's Avatar
Posts: 33 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Israel
#16
Hi all,
I remember reading about pr1.2 shipping with different Extras repository binding (distribution = fremantle-1.2) a while back:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/list...velopers/59177
*it was also announced in maemo weekly news.

Did any of that happen eventually or did they find a better solution?

If it did, after installing qt 4.6 packages as the libqt4-* packages on the rootfs (if i'm not mistaken that's what this thread is about), should i also change something in the application manager repositories?

I want to start testing the Nokia Qt SDK on my N900, but i also use that device as my primary cellphone / gadget.

thanks.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to OranAgra For This Useful Post:
Venemo's Avatar
Posts: 1,296 | Thanked: 1,773 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Budapest, Hungary
#17
Originally Posted by OranAgra View Post
...
Hi OranAgra,

I also heard of the fremantle-1.2 stuff, but I'm not sure why is it necessary. Everything that required the former Qt version still works for me.

Perhaps I am just lucky, but I couldn't find anything that is not working because of it, yet.

If you do, please post it in this thread for everyone to see.
 
Posts: 190 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Bavaria, Germany
#18
Originally Posted by Venemo View Post
... Everything that required the former Qt version still works for me.
QProgressDialog does not get off the screen when calling close(). With PR 1.2 or libqt4-maemo5 you need to call accept() or reject(). That's the only difference I've found.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gri For This Useful Post:
Venemo's Avatar
Posts: 1,296 | Thanked: 1,773 times | Joined on Aug 2009 @ Budapest, Hungary
#19
Originally Posted by gri View Post
QProgressDialog does not get off the screen when calling close(). With PR 1.2 or libqt4-maemo5 you need to call accept() or reject(). That's the only difference I've found.
This is getting even more ridiculous. So this is why they have to mess up the repositories?

This may as well be a bug.
At least, it breaks source compatibility. Did you contact the Qt team about it?
 
Posts: 190 | Thanked: 129 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Bavaria, Germany
#20
Originally Posted by Venemo View Post
This is getting even more ridiculous. So this is why they have to mess up the repositories?

This may as well be a bug.
At least, it breaks source compatibility. Did you contact the Qt team about it?
Not yet, I just changed my code and thought I may have been wrong when using close(). Although it works on all other platforms ... (Someone should verify that)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gri For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
libqt4, qt-sdk, remedy

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49.