Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 2 days, 9 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 4 days, 6 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 5 days, 3 hrs ago - more...
|
2013-06-04
, 09:58
|
|
Posts: 1,523 |
Thanked: 1,997 times |
Joined on Jul 2011
@ not your mom's FOSS basement
|
#22
|
...or use 'kill -9 $(pidof process_name)' -- SIGHUP may be a better first try than forcekill.
 |
|
2013-06-04
, 10:32
|
|
Posts: 76 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Dec 2012
|
#23
|
here's what i got. is there anything that shouldn't be there? i don't wanna start killing processes without knowing what they are.
as for the shake torch it is very useful. it lets you turn on/off your torch flashlight just by shaking the phone even from the lock screen.
Code:
Mem: 712988K used, 295660K free, 0K shrd, 9740K buff, 197776K cached CPU: 5.7% usr 0.9% sys 0.0% nic 92.4% idle 0.1% io 0.5% irq 0.0% sirq Load average: 0.30 0.19 0.27 1/355 18672 PID PPID USER STAT VSZ %VSZ %CPU COMMAND 14360 1 user S < 228m 22.9 0.0 /usr/bin/meego-im-uiserver -remote-theme -u 10379 876 user S 203m 20.5 0.0 /usr/bin/fenix -prestart 18471 876 user S < 191m 19.3 0.0 /opt/forum-qml/bin/forum-qml --tmo 13206 876 user S 189m 19.1 0.0 /usr/bin/call-history -prestart 16938 876 user S 180m 18.2 0.0 /usr/bin/camera-ui -prestart 1824 876 user S 180m 18.2 0.0 /usr/bin/messaging-ui -prestart 16505 876 user S 165m 16.6 0.0 /usr/bin/call-ui -prestart 957 1 user S < 163m 16.5 0.0 /usr/bin/meegotouchhome -remote-theme -upst 2080 876 user S 161m 16.2 0.0 /usr/bin/contacts -prestart 18058 876 user S 155m 15.7 0.0 /usr/bin/grob -prestart 1124 1 user S 152m 15.3 0.6 /usr/bin/sysuid -graphicssystem meego 2207 876 user S 146m 14.7 0.0 /usr/bin/organiser -prestart 931 876 user S < 123m 12.4 0.0 /usr/bin/conndlgs 18561 876 user S < 115m 11.6 0.0 booster-m 933 876 user S N 113m 11.3 0.0 /usr/bin/applifed.x 1347 1 user S N 112m 11.3 0.0 /usr/bin/msyncd 18626 876 user S < 111m 11.2 0.0 booster-d 1528 1385 user S N 109m 11.0 0.0 msgindexer 1629 1 user S N 107m 10.8 0.0 /usr/bin/contactsd 1762 1 user S < 107m 10.8 0.0 /usr/bin/commhistoryd 876 1 user S < 104m 10.5 0.0 /usr/bin/applauncherd.bin --boot-mode ~ $
|
|
2013-06-04
, 13:01
|
|
Posts: 230 |
Thanked: 302 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Helsinki, Suomi (Finland)
|
#24
|
Everything there looks normal. Now you have also more free memory (ca. 305MB) compared to your previous posting.
There also exists app called n9-button monitor, which lets you to use long press of volume keys to light the flash LED when the phone is idle. I haven't used that shaketorch app yet and I don't really know if polling accelometer is more resource intensive (just have a gut feeling it might be), but maybe someone with more knowledge can comment on that.
Other than that your N9 is probably as fast as it can be without overclocking. Even if this device is quite tweakable the hardware has its limits.
Also if swapping becomes a problem, then reducing systems tendency to swap *might help a little. I expect that you won't even notice the difference, but if you wish to try you can write some smaller value to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness (default if I recall correct is 25). Smaller value means that kernel will be more conservative in moving pages to swap. Values can range from 0 to 100.
Example:
Setting swappiness like above is not permanent and is in effect only until next reboot (then sysctl sets it to default value, which is defined in /etc/default/sysctl). As to what value works best for N9, no idea. I use 10 right now.
There also exists app called n9-button monitor, which lets you to use long press of volume keys to light the flash LED when the phone is idle. I haven't used that shaketorch app yet and I don't really know if polling accelometer is more resource intensive (just have a gut feeling it might be), but maybe someone with more knowledge can comment on that.
Other than that your N9 is probably as fast as it can be without overclocking. Even if this device is quite tweakable the hardware has its limits.
Also if swapping becomes a problem, then reducing systems tendency to swap *might help a little. I expect that you won't even notice the difference, but if you wish to try you can write some smaller value to /proc/sys/vm/swappiness (default if I recall correct is 25). Smaller value means that kernel will be more conservative in moving pages to swap. Values can range from 0 to 100.
Example:
Code:
~ # cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 10 ~ # echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness ~ # cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 1 ~ #
| The Following User Says Thank You to ladoga For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2013-06-04
, 19:10
|
|
Posts: 605 |
Thanked: 1,778 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Helsinki
|
#25
|
Originally Posted by ladoga
You can check the output of dmesg and you will realize that you are correct. There are 2 chipsets being used in N9 and 3 camera modules too IIRC ;-)
Bit off-topic, but the performance of N9's flash storage seems to vary quite wildly from N9 to another, Maybe Nokia aquired chips from several sources.
For example I have two N9's which give very different results using hdparm.:
| The Following User Says Thank You to MSameer For This Useful Post: | ||
@Yisroel
Good. Nothing out of ordinary in CPU usage, but something seems to be hogging your RAM. Try to hit "m" key while running top and it will sort processes by highest memory usage. Maybe some app has a memory leak or has crashed and is still reserving RAM for itself.
You are also running some daemon called theshaketorchd in the background, which is using some CPU and RAM. Though if you find the app useful and haven't experienced too much of battery drain t's probably not a problem.
PS. While looking at this I also ran top on my own phone ane noticed that cutetube had crashed (I didn't have it open and I have disabled the cutetubed daemon) and hogging over 200MB of RAM.
To kill processes you have two ways. Using PID (process ID), which you can see from top or ps output. Or by using the name of the process.
Former is done with command "kill [PID]" and latter by command killall [name]. Both take flag -9 to force kill if the process doesn't respond. So for example: