Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 2 days, 12 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 4 days, 9 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 5 days, 6 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to dmj726 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-11-15
, 22:47
|
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#382
|
joerg_rw,
I think that this thread has been rather un-noisy compared to several others. Remember that there are people who have thanked you and MohammadAG.
.edit
Also please use WIKI for making guides/manuals. Not in middle of thread.
Last edited by slender; 2010-11-15 at 23:02.
I think that this thread has been rather un-noisy compared to several others. Remember that there are people who have thanked you and MohammadAG.
.edit
Also please use WIKI for making guides/manuals. Not in middle of thread.
__________________
TMO links: [iSpy] - [Power search] - [Most thanked] - [Cordia - Maemo5 UI on top MeeGo Core] - [CommunitySSU]
TMO links: [iSpy] - [Power search] - [Most thanked] - [Cordia - Maemo5 UI on top MeeGo Core] - [CommunitySSU]
Last edited by slender; 2010-11-15 at 23:02.
 |
|
2010-11-15
, 22:57
|
|
Posts: 552 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Not decided
|
#383
|
For you guys
Stop bothering developpers and make useless posts. I understand that you dont know so much but stop it. Only bad things can cause. Start reading, its not bad.
Stop bothering developpers and make useless posts. I understand that you dont know so much but stop it. Only bad things can cause. Start reading, its not bad.
__________________
My name was Maemo, then it became Meego and now I'm getting a third one. I am Sailfish.
My name was Maemo, then it became Meego and now I'm getting a third one. I am Sailfish.
| The Following User Says Thank You to anapospastos For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-11-16
, 08:15
|
|
Posts: 509 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ indonesia
|
#384
|
sigh. I ve problem cant copy file from n900 to flashdisk which is FAT32, nor filebox. thats wierd . cause yesterday I can copy file from n900 t other usb flash which is same format.
should I mount with this mount /dev/sda1 /media/FAT32.
same happen while I plug my N86. but cant copy from n900 to N86.
but FAT format work flawlessly. is this happen only to me. or cause I use modification usb adapter fm to fm which is taken from usb adapter fm to m.
oh anyway how to make it become unread only. caus in filebox acces permission denied.
what it is mean ?
[ 568.285247] usb 1-1: Product: N86 8MP
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Nokia
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: IMEI has been removed by me.
[ 568.285308] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
[ 568.285339] hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 enable change, status 00000503
[ 573.288787] usb-storage: device scan complete
[ 573.304138] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.304534] scsi 3:0:0:1: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.314086] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.315124] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.319854] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.320312] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.320343] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.320373] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.320373] sda: sda1
[ 573.636535] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
[ 573.657104] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.657714] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.657745] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.657775] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.660644] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.661010] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.661041] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.661071] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.661071] sdb: sdb1
[ 573.914489] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
[ 853.012542] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 853.012573] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 853.012573] File system has been set read-only
[ 855.430023] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 855.430053] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 855.430603] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sdb1)
[ 855.430633] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
Last edited by cloud596; 2010-11-16 at 08:18.
should I mount with this mount /dev/sda1 /media/FAT32.
same happen while I plug my N86. but cant copy from n900 to N86.
but FAT format work flawlessly. is this happen only to me. or cause I use modification usb adapter fm to fm which is taken from usb adapter fm to m.
oh anyway how to make it become unread only. caus in filebox acces permission denied.
what it is mean ?
[ 568.285247] usb 1-1: Product: N86 8MP
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Nokia
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: IMEI has been removed by me.
[ 568.285308] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
[ 568.285339] hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 enable change, status 00000503
[ 573.288787] usb-storage: device scan complete
[ 573.304138] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.304534] scsi 3:0:0:1: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.314086] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.315124] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.319854] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.320312] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.320343] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.320373] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.320373] sda: sda1
[ 573.636535] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
[ 573.657104] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.657714] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.657745] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.657775] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.660644] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.661010] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.661041] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.661071] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.661071] sdb: sdb1
[ 573.914489] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
[ 853.012542] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 853.012573] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 853.012573] File system has been set read-only
[ 855.430023] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 855.430053] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 855.430603] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sdb1)
[ 855.430633] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
Last edited by cloud596; 2010-11-16 at 08:18.
| The Following User Says Thank You to cloud596 For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-11-16
, 13:17
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#385
|
Thanks for this exemplary report. You did comparative tests, with a new device not yet seen here (N86), you bothered to go through dmesg log and pasted important parts (though actual hostmode happened some few lines earlier). I'm glad to help.
If they are, then we'd need the dmesg from both the working and the non-working case, with a bit more header (maybe 50 lines more), to tell exactly what failed for you.
So basically for h-e-n hostmode this is 100% success. The above line has been defined as a flag about which problems belong to this thread, and which ones are better posted to the http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65570 problems thread. Anyway, while I'm at it, I'll continue here for this time
Your N86 *could* have a different format, not FAT. E.G. NTFS might also be possible.
Also:
Sometimes things like this can be seen when you have superfloppy format instead of partition table. You might try to mount /dev/sda instead of /dev/sda1. Before you do, make sure you got backup of the N86, as mounting a partitioned drive as a superfloppy is dangerous.
First of all, and best test you can do:
If you can access N86 flawlessly from your linux PC, then do a mount and a df -h on the PC, after you connected (and mounted?) the N86. In mount's output you should see how it's mounted there, and you can use same type of mount command and parameters for mounting the N86 on N900.
Same applies for your flashdisks. If you can see them in dmesg, but they fail to mount, do the suggested tests, and report there: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65570. That thread is about problems with mounting etc.
If you don't see a line like
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: xxxx
for any of your USB devices, then report here, and include the dmesg log for the full process (you can do a dmesg before you start h-e-n, and write down the timestamp of the last line. Everything after that line, printed by h-e-n faulty connect, should go here). Please also include a detailed description what you did, in which sequence (like "plugged in memstick ACMEstore to adaper and N900; started h-e-n GUI, touched HS button, after 5 seconds I did...")
Thanks you for the report, good luck
jOERG
Last edited by joerg_rw; 2010-11-17 at 16:06.
Originally Posted by cloud596
Are you sure they were absolutely same format (see below)?
sigh. I ve problem cant copy file from n900 to flashdisk which is FAT32, nor filebox. thats wierd . cause yesterday I can copy file from n900 t other usb flash which is same format.
If they are, then we'd need the dmesg from both the working and the non-working case, with a bit more header (maybe 50 lines more), to tell exactly what failed for you.
Originally Posted by cloud596
No, your adapter seems ok, see below
should I mount with this mount /dev/sda1 /media/FAT32.
same happen while I plug my N86. but cant copy from n900 to N86.
but FAT format work flawlessly. is this happen only to me. or cause I use modification usb adapter fm to fm which is taken from usb adapter fm to m.
Originally Posted by cloud596
this is a clear indication hostmode worked correctly and conected to your N86.
oh anyway how to make it become unread only. caus in filebox acces permission denied.
what it is mean ?
[ 568.285247] usb 1-1: Product: N86 8MP
So basically for h-e-n hostmode this is 100% success. The above line has been defined as a flag about which problems belong to this thread, and which ones are better posted to the http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65570 problems thread. Anyway, while I'm at it, I'll continue here for this time
Originally Posted by cloud596
N900 found storage "disk" sda (with allegedly one partition sda1)
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Nokia
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: IMEI has been removed by me.
[ 568.285308] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
[ 568.285339] hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 enable change, status 00000503
[ 573.288787] usb-storage: device scan complete
[ 573.304138] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.304534] scsi 3:0:0:1: Direct-Access Nokia S60 1.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 0
[ 573.314086] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.315093] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.315124] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.319854] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] 15728640 512-byte hardware sectors: (8.05 GB/7.50 GiB)
[ 573.320312] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[ 573.320343] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.320373] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.320373] sda: sda1
[ 573.636535] sd 3:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
Originally Posted by cloud596
N900 found storage "disk" sdb (and sdb1 partition?)
[ 573.657104] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.657714] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.657745] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.657775] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.660644] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] 15564800 512-byte hardware sectors: (7.96 GB/7.42 GiB)
[ 573.661010] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 573.661041] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
[ 573.661071] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through
[ 573.661071] sdb: sdb1
[ 573.914489] sd 3:0:0:1: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
Originally Posted by cloud596
Now when trying to access sda1 and sdb1, the FAT filesystem driver found there's a problem on the disk, and set it read only.
[ 853.012542] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 853.012573] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 853.012573] File system has been set read-only
[ 855.430023] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sda1)
[ 855.430053] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
[ 855.430603] FAT: Filesystem error (dev sdb1)
[ 855.430633] fat_get_cluster: invalid cluster chain (i_pos 0)
Your N86 *could* have a different format, not FAT. E.G. NTFS might also be possible.
Also:
Sometimes things like this can be seen when you have superfloppy format instead of partition table. You might try to mount /dev/sda instead of /dev/sda1. Before you do, make sure you got backup of the N86, as mounting a partitioned drive as a superfloppy is dangerous.
First of all, and best test you can do:
If you can access N86 flawlessly from your linux PC, then do a mount and a df -h on the PC, after you connected (and mounted?) the N86. In mount's output you should see how it's mounted there, and you can use same type of mount command and parameters for mounting the N86 on N900.
Same applies for your flashdisks. If you can see them in dmesg, but they fail to mount, do the suggested tests, and report there: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65570. That thread is about problems with mounting etc.
If you don't see a line like
[ 568.285278] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: xxxx
for any of your USB devices, then report here, and include the dmesg log for the full process (you can do a dmesg before you start h-e-n, and write down the timestamp of the last line. Everything after that line, printed by h-e-n faulty connect, should go here). Please also include a detailed description what you did, in which sequence (like "plugged in memstick ACMEstore to adaper and N900; started h-e-n GUI, touched HS button, after 5 seconds I did...")
Thanks you for the report, good luck
jOERG
__________________
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member
EX Hildon Foundation approved Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/
IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N
Last edited by joerg_rw; 2010-11-17 at 16:06.
| The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-11-16
, 19:36
|
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#386
|
Does someone knows here if the "Nokia CA-157" adapter is compatible with the N900 for low power USB devices?
I saw that it cost's only 4,60$ (free shipping) @ http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.51045
I saw that it cost's only 4,60$ (free shipping) @ http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.51045
|
|
2010-11-16
, 19:53
|
|
Posts: 543 |
Thanked: 151 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Germany
|
#388
|
Originally Posted by dmj726
I see, thanks for the fast reply.
Crogge: The end of that cable is not shaped right. You would have to file two of the metal corners off.
|
|
2010-11-18
, 01:11
|
|
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2010
|
#389
|
Hello friends i tried hen beta 0.28 with n900 pr 1.3 and kernel power flasher 45
this app is incredible
and i can conect a pendrive , a mouse and a keyboard and a jostick and a hub with 4 usb ports with energy adaptor .
I have connected a joystick, a mouse, a keyboard, a USB at the same time with a usb hub.
all run very well, mouse energy and move , keyboard mapping correct and writting and jostick play well, i dont know , why other people say that this application do not running
i played with muppen 64 n64 emulator xena princcess game with 4 gamepad , 2 usb gamepad and 2 ps3 sixaxis
ps3 sixaxis and hid scripts problem , but I solved this
well only with hen and any commands with xterminal, only for developers , not newbies asking , thanks,
well application go ! go! go!
in youtube more videos with hen running mouse and keyboards and pendrive ,
it is very real
bye friends
this app is incredible
and i can conect a pendrive , a mouse and a keyboard and a jostick and a hub with 4 usb ports with energy adaptor .
I have connected a joystick, a mouse, a keyboard, a USB at the same time with a usb hub.
all run very well, mouse energy and move , keyboard mapping correct and writting and jostick play well, i dont know , why other people say that this application do not running
i played with muppen 64 n64 emulator xena princcess game with 4 gamepad , 2 usb gamepad and 2 ps3 sixaxis
ps3 sixaxis and hid scripts problem , but I solved this
well only with hen and any commands with xterminal, only for developers , not newbies asking , thanks,
well application go ! go! go!
in youtube more videos with hen running mouse and keyboards and pendrive ,
it is very real
bye friends
| The Following User Says Thank You to n900FANATIC For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-11-18
, 03:09
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Tampere
|
#390
|
Hey guys,
I plugged in my USB audio interface, and n900 recognized it correctly
[83332.446411] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=08bb, idProduct=2704
[83332.446441] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[83332.446502] usb 1-1: Product: USB Audio DAC
[83332.446502] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Burr-Brown from TI
[83332.446563] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
[83332.446655] hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 enable change, status 00000103
[83333.026641] usbhid 1-1:1.2: usb_probe_interface
[83333.026672] usbhid 1-1:1.2: usb_probe_interface - got id
[83333.035034] input: Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio DAC as /class/input/input18
[83333.131317] generic-usb 0003:08BB:2704.0001: input: USB HID v1.00 Device [Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio DAC ] on usb-musb_hdrc-1/input2
[83333.133331] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[83333.133361] usbhid: v2.6:USB HID core driver
now the only problem is, how do i make the usb device default for all audio output?
I plugged in my USB audio interface, and n900 recognized it correctly
[83332.446411] usb 1-1: New USB device found, idVendor=08bb, idProduct=2704
[83332.446441] usb 1-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
[83332.446502] usb 1-1: Product: USB Audio DAC
[83332.446502] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Burr-Brown from TI
[83332.446563] hub 1-0:1.0: state 7 ports 1 chg 0000 evt 0002
[83332.446655] hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 enable change, status 00000103
[83333.026641] usbhid 1-1:1.2: usb_probe_interface
[83333.026672] usbhid 1-1:1.2: usb_probe_interface - got id
[83333.035034] input: Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio DAC as /class/input/input18
[83333.131317] generic-usb 0003:08BB:2704.0001: input: USB HID v1.00 Device [Burr-Brown from TI USB Audio DAC ] on usb-musb_hdrc-1/input2
[83333.133331] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[83333.133361] usbhid: v2.6:USB HID core driver
now the only problem is, how do i make the usb device default for all audio output?
I'm sorry you're getting frustrated with the community. I sometimes find it annoying that people can't be bothered to read a couple posts back too. However, I might point out (not having read more than perhaps 10 pages of the thread myself), that I could understand if some people wouldn't read the first 10 posts every time they looked at the thread. Perhaps MohammadAG could put the relevant information in the first post, which is what I assume people would have read before posting anything.