Reply
Thread Tools
krk969's Avatar
Posts: 754 | Thanked: 630 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ London
#11
Originally Posted by reviver View Post
If you do request access, I would suggest spending some time formulating the question. Asking "Can I rip your website?" vs. something like "I really like your website. I would like to offer this information to mobile users... What kind of attribution and linking would be required? etc."
LOL, sure
 
Posts: 323 | Thanked: 118 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Australia
#12
I was actually thinking the same thing just after I hit reply
 
zwer's Avatar
Posts: 455 | Thanked: 782 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Netherlands
#13
Originally Posted by krk969 View Post
In apps, we would not like to display the entire content as it would display on a normal browser with ad blocker , so we extract the relevant data from the response html and display what we want
( we arent changing data but just the format thats what i had meant by not modifying data )
hope that clarifies
So, how does it differ then from FF + AdBlock Plus + Greasemonkey then?

It's quite of a gray area, but unless the target website specifically condemns such usage of their web site, I think you are pretty much in the clear
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zwer For This Useful Post:
krk969's Avatar
Posts: 754 | Thanked: 630 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ London
#14
Originally Posted by zwer View Post
So, how does it differ then from FF + AdBlock Plus + Greasemonkey then?

It's quite of a gray area, but unless the target website specifically condemns such usage of their web site, I think you are pretty much in the clear
Im assuming the same here too actually, that if they dont state any such intellectual property rights on their page then its safe to query their website with our app created queries.

Since this is a grey area , hence the thread.
My intention of raising a thread was to be sure we know what we are doing when creating such apps, was hoping to get some more concrete information actually, maybe there are people around who may have created apps like ive described and/or have done their homework for this to share it here with us.
examples would definetely help.
 
zwer's Avatar
Posts: 455 | Thanked: 782 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Netherlands
#15
Well, you can always use the old argument of guns not killing people - people kill people (tho the gun certainly helps ), that has been used as an excuse of many developers of somewhat questionable applications.

Your app won't be, ehm, stealing data from any site - users will. And good luck to the authorities for chasing individual users, if that were possible, piracy wouldn't exist.
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#16
Originally Posted by krk969 View Post
Im assuming the same here too actually, that if they dont state any such intellectual property rights on their page then its safe to query their website with our app created queries.

Since this is a grey area , hence the thread.
My intention of raising a thread was to be sure we know what we are doing when creating such apps, was hoping to get some more concrete information actually, maybe there are people around who may have created apps like ive described and/or have done their homework for this to share it here with us.
examples would definetely help.
It is just like everything else. What is dubious and should be illegal is receiving monetary compensation or consideration of any value from the fruits of some one else's labor or established intellectual property.

HTML is the original "Free and Open Source" code and should remain so. Many have "scraped" or linked directly to other peoples content in order to by-pass un-needed information or to format the information for a different platform.
I do it all the time and store my efforts locally on my tablet and/or N900.


Now if I charged money for these pages or apps which use this content or included the code in a page on my website that I receive revenue from different ads and such, I should pay the producer for his efforts or expect to be held liable.

(This of course is a bit simplified for the sake of this discussion. Other liabilities exist such as altering trademarks and what not.)

If someone was using my data there are ways to obscure it, but others will always find a way to use it. It is easy however to track this use, and lawyers who are willing to serve, are piled up like cord wood outside the doors.

This system has worked since the Romans ruled the world and as far as I'm concerned it is not broken. HTML should always remain open.

One of my peeves when the iPhone first came out was in it's intent to upset this order by requiring content to be specifically formatted for its platform. This model of theirs has changed since its introduction because users demanded more... and that's a good thing.

On the plus side though, Apples model has kept legal fracases over content behind the doors of their app store where makers of the many different iFart apps can argue over who was first, or who's fart is the nastiest.

Meh...
I don't care, and have been happily pulling and using content from sites like Paul's Weather Page since I first cobbled together a windows socket back in the day .

Edited Update:
When I lived in the Bay Area I first started to go to Paul's page in order to quickly find needed information like "Will my campsite be flooded this week-end." or just knowing what clothes to pack for a short trip. Viewing the source code from his page back then and using it to experiment with variations on my own pages is what taught me how to use HTML in the first place.

For those who can remember back in the day, most information was only available via FTP so pulling and posting via HTML was a service for those who didn't have, or were not inclined to access it via Archie, Gopher, Veronica and Jughead . Also, there were only about 3,500 pages available then to use as a reference. Some of us even met up on the weekend in places like the parking lot of Fry's in Fremont, or the Point in Saucalito to swap code saved to floppies or written down on pieces of paper. It was truly a small world then.

This thread prompted some reminiscing (thank you). As a result I was just cruisin' his site where I came up with the following posting when I clicked on one of his links.

Unfortunately that^ was posted almost 3 years ago and sadly it is often the outcome when people become overly protective of even publicly sponsored data.
A good idea and useful service becomes stifled and the common man ends up with a soggy sleeping bag wearing the wrong dang shoes.
__________________

SLN member # 009

Last edited by YoDude; 2010-01-17 at 19:00. Reason: Old man's vanity. :)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post:
krk969's Avatar
Posts: 754 | Thanked: 630 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ London
#17
LOL, that post was good read YoDude !

just called up a website that I wanted to access through an app.
I mentioned all the kind words and the max that I could credit them with is a free mention of them in my free app

they said they would look into it and get back.

somehow i feel better now that i called them, this got me so hassled , though I know its not right to keep data unshareable which is accessed by the public for the public .
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:29.