Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,102 | Thanked: 1,937 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ Berlin, Germany
#51
Originally Posted by sifo View Post
i never wanted to change winblows but after reading you guys cheering over here i like the idea about installing a linux distro but if im thinking about installing a rude distro (for h*ck*ng) which one it should be ? backtrack ?

./sifo
You could search http://distrowatch.org for specific distributions of GNU Linux. There are plenty to discover, if you have special requirements.
 
mrsellout's Avatar
Posts: 889 | Thanked: 2,087 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Manchester
#52
Originally Posted by dumpystig View Post
Right, I'm halfway thro' LiLi/Ubuntu setup. once this is done I'm off to bed, work in the morning.
Thanks for the inputs guys, I'll be back tomorrow, let you know what I think.
There's no need to lower the tone with images like that :P.

Seriously though omgubuntu.co.uk is a good fansite with articles that may be interesting/helpful, these two in particular might help get you up and running.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to mrsellout For This Useful Post:
dumpystig's Avatar
Posts: 464 | Thanked: 338 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK, Northwest
#53
Lower the tone???

Just seen where you're @
 
Posts: 470 | Thanked: 399 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ Croatia
#54
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
I agree with Ubuntu and Mint as recommendations. Ubuntu has a windows installer. http://www.ubuntu.com/download/deskt...dows-installer You click on the exe, download and reboot.


I would add http://crunchbanglinux.org/ It's not as friendly, but it's fast. PCLinuxOS http://www.pclinuxos.com/ is newbie friendly. it has good hardware support and easy configuration tools. And puppy linux http://puppylinux.org/ just because it's fun. WOOF

You could and should try linux live cds, or put it on a usbck.
http://www.pendrivelinux.com/ that way you can try different linux distros and you won't hurt your windows install.

If you're interested in the few people suggesting Gentoo, I would suggest sabayon http://www.sabayon.org/ instead. It's Gentoo with no fuss.
DO NOT USE WINDOWS INSTALLER! and i can not emphasize this enough, this will install linux on the same partition as windows in a virtual partition which will result in two things:
no benefit from journaled fs
and much lower performance
 
Posts: 1,341 | Thanked: 708 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#55
Originally Posted by GrimyHR View Post
DO NOT USE WINDOWS INSTALLER! and i can not emphasize this enough, this will install linux on the same partition as windows in a virtual partition which will result in two things:
no benefit from journaled fs
and much lower performance
Depends on what Windows installer. Fedora's LiveUSB-creator for MS Windows will install Live Fedora Linux on a USB-stick without touching the MS Windows system. Then after booting with LiveUSB you are already in Linux and can install a real Linux-partition straight or if needed after shrinking the Windows partition.
 
Posts: 470 | Thanked: 399 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ Croatia
#56
Originally Posted by zimon View Post
Depends on what Windows installer. Fedora's LiveUSB-creator for MS Windows will install Live Fedora Linux on a USB-stick without touching the MS Windows system. Then after booting with LiveUSB you are already in Linux and can install a real Linux-partition straight or if needed after shrinking the Windows partition.
instaler we are discussing is wubi, and that to which you are refering is NOT a windows instaler, it is a live usb creator, huge difference
 

The Following User Says Thank You to GrimyHR For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,523 | Thanked: 1,997 times | Joined on Jul 2011 @ not your mom's FOSS basement
#57
Originally Posted by geneven View Post
I have recommended Mint myself many times, and was one of its early fans. I wonder why it borrowed so heavily from Ubuntu if Ubuntu is such horse manure. In fact, such intolerant rhetoric on your part says a lot more about you than about Ubuntu.
(I will omit going personal because this says alot more about you then)

- because its too easy to sit on the Ubuntu bandwagon / their huge package and services infrastructure instead of using a different base?

I wouldnt recommend Ubuntu for all the things they've done (Unity, the title bar buttons issue, at my time of usage one of the worst KDE integrations, but really for not listening to their base) but especially for their serious QA issues - how many, even LTS, releases were butchered because some packages or components just were rushed to be upgraded/switched to fit in their release cycle?); I was burned particularly of the failed PulseAudio integration (which gave PA itself a very bad light but most of the issues were Ubuntu only) and broken upgrade procedures which left the system unbootable. Some very good points were highlighted here and i endorse this article fully.

"Everyone is using it so it must be good" was never a sign for quality. And i expect _you_ to know that.

Last edited by don_falcone; 2012-05-12 at 13:25.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to don_falcone For This Useful Post:
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#58
If you have the disk space, the memory and a good multi core machine, trying out different distros can be fun. So, forget the live CD route and go virtual; this is 2012 where rebooting is frowned upon.

Click here for more details:

https://www.virtualbox.org/
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 86 | Thanked: 164 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#59
Originally Posted by GrimyHR View Post
DO NOT USE WINDOWS INSTALLER! and i can not emphasize this enough, this will install linux on the same partition as windows in a virtual partition which will result in two things:
no benefit from journaled fs
and much lower performance
The topic is Linux for the beginner. Not Linux for the server / performance geek / hacker. Performance and filesystem differences are not even on this guy's radar.

edit: oops. just noticed it's a workstation with RAID. valid point

If you want to introduce someone to using Linux, the easiest and safest way is still the ubuntu windows installer.

I'm actually quite surprised you wouldn't bring up "loadfont not found". If you upgrade the distro you get your first Linux troubleshooting experience and need to edit a config file from a livecd to get into Ubuntu again.

Other than that the Installer is quite nice.

Last edited by anonymous; 2012-05-12 at 13:51. Reason: touche
 
Posts: 14 | Thanked: 12 times | Joined on Mar 2012
#60
I have had a lot of Linux/windows machines in the past. The best way to install Linux, and for beginners I would say OpenSUSE, is to boot a install disk.

The OpenSUSE installer will tell you what to do and tells you what the best way is to partition the drives. And best of all. It will shrink any windows drive if needed but will try to avoid this.

Now I have been running a OpenSUSE installation just by itself. And you can just update to the new version. No need for a new install.

About the yast tools. There the best. have used most of the others around and start missing YaST.

BTW, SuSE is the only one that has the nVidia drivers packaged by nVidia themselves. So Just install the drive from Yast after the installation (cant be done at a new install due to licenses) and it will activate it by it self now extra steps needed.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53.