Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (0)
to General by Kalatti - 13 hrs, 49 mins ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (117)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 2 days, 10 hrs ago -
Firefox with Leste (6)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 3 days, 7 hrs ago - more...
wierdo |
2010-07-06
, 06:10
|
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#41
|
Originally Posted by ossipena
It's a fair evaluation of how the camera will perform for most people, since most people just let their camera (especially their cameraphone!) do whatever it wants.
 |
|
2010-07-06
, 06:12
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#42
|
Originally Posted by wierdo
exactly, but that isn't image quality. so referring to image quality with this is hugely misleading
It's a fair evaluation of how the camera will perform for most people, since most people just let their camera (especially their cameraphone!) do whatever it wants.
__________________
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
Want to know something?
K.I.S.S. approach:
wiki category:beginners. Browse it through and you'll be much wiser!
If the link doesn't help, just use
Google Custom Search
|
|
2010-07-06
, 07:05
|
|
Posts: 35 |
Thanked: 27 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
@ Finland
|
#43
|
F looks like it has much better dynamic range than any of the others, managing to capture detail in the shadows of the first pic without even of hint of blowing out the sky. But even it has, in my opinion, pretty awful quality overall. All are ruined by horrendous amounts of noise reduction followed by sharpening. I think they all are at the point where the quality difference is pretty much meaningless as none pass as decent.
Some low light photos (with flash off) would be good to see as well.
Some low light photos (with flash off) would be good to see as well.
|
|
2010-07-06
, 08:54
|
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ germany
|
#44
|
i'll eat my hat if C is not taken with n900!
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:26
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#45
|
Wow, F wipes the floor with others!
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:26
|
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#46
|
Originally Posted by agg1n
i'll eat my hat if C is not taken with n900!
lol what sort of hat do you have? I guess i can't help it but let you eat your hat haha. C is Sony Ericsson X10 Mini. Answer revealed at page 1.
Shocking result really. Seems like iPhone 4 isn't better than N900 in taking picture. What about video? I'll get back to you all with another thread lol.
For now E72 won hands down. I personally like F the most.
Edit: Mixed up lol. Now it's correct. C is SEX10
Last edited by maxximuscool; 2010-07-06 at 20:43.
| The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:40
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#47
|
Was there any detectable change in lighting conditions when F was taken? It looks so much better than the rest that I get suspicious 
iPhone is the second best, IMO (with just a slight margin to others though).
iPhone is the second best, IMO (with just a slight margin to others though).
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:42
|
|
Posts: 50 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Kiel, Germany
|
#48
|
[No Fanboy] I thinks B looks best (colors) [/No Fanboy]
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:44
|
|
Posts: 194 |
Thanked: 87 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#49
|
they are all **** against a decent digicam!
|
|
2010-07-06
, 11:46
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#50
|
@Turkishflavor
they are all **** against a mediocre 10 years old digicam!
they are all **** against a mediocre 10 years old digicam!