|
2008-01-27
, 09:53
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#12
|
|
2008-01-27
, 10:01
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#13
|
sfdisk -T
Id name
b W95 FAT32
c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
|
2008-01-27
, 10:05
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#14
|
|
2008-01-27
, 10:06
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#15
|
If you're ever in Dubai, I'm buying you a round!
|
2008-01-27
, 10:13
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#16
|
|
2008-01-27
, 10:21
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#17
|
Couldn't have done it if you didn't set me back on the right path. I now understand that
x,y,z means
x= start address block
y= end address block
z = file system type (6 = FAT16, 0C = W95 FAT WBA, not sure what Linux is)
Strangely enough, when I partitioned my system the first time using:
1,14000,0C
,,,
followed by
mkdosfs /dev/mmcblk0p1
mke2fs /dev/mmcblk0p2
Control panel -> Memory only showed that I had 473MB of space available.
I'm assuming that the Memory applet shows the FAT memory, so I can't explain why it was showing the storage memory allocated to Linux.
Did I get them mixed up and should have used
mkdosfs /dev/mmcblk0p2
mke2fs /dev/mmcblk0p1
instead?
mkdosfs /dev/mmcblk0p1
mke2fs /dev/mmcblk0p2
|
2008-01-27
, 10:27
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#18
|
|
2008-01-27
, 10:41
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#19
|
So what you're saying is that the Memory applet was correct is showing me the amount of space in internal memory?
Mine was looking something like this (http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...&postcount=242) when I opened the Memory applet after partitioning and running
./nupgrade.sh 0
./nupgrade.sh 1
./nupgrade.sh 2
./nupgrade.sh 3
./nupgrade.sh 4
reboot
except that I had 473MB of storage space instead of the 4.87 GB that dan had.
Seeing that I had tried to partition for 14GB of FAT storage and .95GB (or so) of Linux strorage, I had expected device memory to be in the region of 300+ MB, and internal storage to be in the region of 14GB
I still haven't figured out where I went wrong.
|
2008-01-27
, 10:50
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#20
|
-John