Active Topics

 


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Reply
Thread Tools
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-13 , 18:30
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#1
After managing to compile QtCreator on-device everything seemed to be well and good and awesome, but today got this error:

Code:
g++ -c -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIE -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_QUICK_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_QML_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -D
QT_SQL_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -I/usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/qt5 -I/usr/include/qt5/QtQuick -I/usr/include/qt5/QtWidge
ts -I/usr/include/qt5/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt5/QtQml -I/usr/include/qt5/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt5/QtSql -I/usr/include/qt5/QtCore -I.
-o qrc_resources.o qrc_resources.cpp
g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://bugs.merproject.org/> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [qrc_resources.o] Error 4
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/dev/cool-retro-term-master/app'
make: *** [sub-app-make_first-ordered] Error 2
The source of the prog is here:
https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term
(you also need the qmltermwidget)

Is that jolla killing process too soon (on first try had it in background and was doing something else, second attempt foreground nothing running except term, same result), or gcc bug? Bit worried, had programs with 12+ hours of compile time on n900 and it looks like the jolla watchdog is killing it :/
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-13 , 19:21
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#2
ok, I think by now tried all the echo tricks from OOM thread, cc1plus still gets killed, not sure if should try swappiness tricks or just gcc bug
 
AapoRantalainen is offline AapoRantalainen
2015-07-13 , 20:48
Posts: 838 | Thanked: 3,384 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#3
Is dmesg showing something, e.g.
Code:
[88886.470155] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'genautomata' (10246), adj 0,
   to free 503056kB on behalf of 'kswapd0' (50) because
   cache 16164kB is below limit 16384kB for oom_score_adj 0
   Free memory is 11948kB above reserved
-> All memory+swap exhausted.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AapoRantalainen For This Useful Post:
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-13 , 23:22
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#4
Yeah, well damn, it's like with scummvm that worked in 1.2.0.5 and stopped with 1.3.0.8, one step forward two steps back (my bet qtcreator is no longer compilable on device):
Code:
[nemo@Jolla ~]$ dmesg | grep lowmem
[ 5942.342712] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'harbour-radio-s' (6416), adj 71,
[ 5942.752326] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'fingerterm' (1289), adj 70,
[ 5944.308224] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5951.088172] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5952.194627] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5953.207964] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5954.442941] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5955.485883] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5957.336699] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5958.812634] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5960.560872] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5961.918814] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5963.222187] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5964.705569] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5965.718479] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'QQuickXmlQueryE' (14427), adj 70,
[ 5966.662321] lowmemorykiller: Killing 'cc1plus' (15149), adj 0,
[nemo@Jolla ~]$
so even with:
echo "0,0,0,0,0" > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree
cc1plus gets killed *sigh*
Last edited by szopin; 2015-07-14 at 01:32.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
nieldk is offline nieldk
2015-07-14 , 04:14
Posts: 1,289 | Thanked: 4,317 times | Joined on Oct 2014
#5
Look here.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/236764
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post:
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-14 , 07:22
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#6
Originally Posted by nieldk View Post
Look here.
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/236764

with
Code:
echo '9999' > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/adj
echo '1' > /sys/module/lowmemorykiller/parameters/minfree
Still cc1plus was killed :/
(interestingly enough, browser running in the background was not, weird, but compilation failed, previously pretty much everything was killed too and only fingerterm left)
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
AapoRantalainen is offline AapoRantalainen
2015-07-14 , 08:34
Posts: 838 | Thanked: 3,384 times | Joined on Mar 2009
#7
How about adding more swap?

Code:
devel-su
fallocate -l 2G /swapfile #2Gigs
chmod 600 /swapfile
mkswap /swapfile
losetup --find --show /swapfile 
# ->  /dev/loop0
swapon /dev/loop0
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AapoRantalainen For This Useful Post:
nieldk is offline nieldk
2015-07-14 , 08:41
Posts: 1,289 | Thanked: 4,317 times | Joined on Oct 2014
#8
Originally Posted by AapoRantalainen View Post
How about adding more swap?

Code:
devel-su
fallocate -l 2G /swapfile #2Gigs
chmod 600 /swapfile
mkswap /swapfile
losetup --find --show /swapfile 
# ->  /dev/loop0
swapon /dev/loop0
perhaps. Or, might be tmpfs that is too small (I run in to this on a regular basis on N9). ?

Can be increased 'on the fly'
(40M in this example)

# mount -o remount,size=40M tmpfs /tmp/
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post:
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-14 , 10:18
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#9
tmp stays at 400mb free throughout (was same on n900, only time needed to resize its tmp was for wifite which used to dump ivs in there)

will check out later with increased swap, hopefully this will do it (but such a shame lowmemkill isn't just toggleable, the too deep sleep at least can be turned off in one command):
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
szopin is offline szopin
2015-07-14 , 16:11
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#10
Ok, after watching in htop, looks like nieldk's answer was correct, the killing of background apps is inhibited and it is just gcc eating through whole swap and then remaining ram until it dies, going to check with increased swap, thanks!
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post:
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top