Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (6)
to General by Kalatti - 5 days, 2 hrs ago - more...
|
2015-10-19
, 13:46
|
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#2
|
Originally Posted by antti.isosalo
What do you mean "Copy left"?
Copy left.
BR,
AJ
Note that the text of the icon is clearly the same as the logo on the page you're reading right now (or at the very least a very close derivative of it). Not sure though about the status of our logo. Probably the copyright would belong to Nokia (?).
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-10-19
, 14:05
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 3,715 |
Thanked: 7,419 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
|
#3
|
Originally Posted by reinob
Copyright....
What do you mean "Copy left"?
Note that the text of the icon is clearly the same as the logo on the page you're reading right now (or at the very least a very close derivative of it). Not sure though about the status of our logo. Probably the copyright would belong to Nokia (?).
it's a play on words
| The Following User Says Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2015-10-19
, 14:16
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#4
|
...and that was reinob's point. Is there really no copyright?
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-10-19
, 15:16
|
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
Well. Everything has automatically a copyright (and not a copyleft, which usually refers to GPL-like constructs). The question is who owns it
...and that was reinob's point. Is there really no copyright?
|
|
2015-10-21
, 03:12
|
|
Posts: 1,994 |
Thanked: 3,342 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
|
#6
|
I think that Maemo trademark was transferred by Nokia to HiFo, and by HiFo to MCeV with Nokia's acknowledgement. I guess that MCeV has already renewed the trademark (in EU at least) for the next 10 years? Not sure what else is needed...
Thank you. Best wishes.
Thank you. Best wishes.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Wikiwide For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-10-21
, 06:14
|
|
Posts: 6,445 |
Thanked: 20,981 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#7
|
Are "Maemo trademark" and "Maemo logo copyright" the same thing?
EDIT: This is a genuine question. IANAL and do not fully understand how these things work.
Last edited by pichlo; 2015-10-21 at 06:52.
EDIT: This is a genuine question. IANAL and do not fully understand how these things work.
Last edited by pichlo; 2015-10-21 at 06:52.
| The Following User Says Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2015-10-21
, 11:21
|
|
Posts: 1,808 |
Thanked: 4,272 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Germany
|
#8
|
Originally Posted by pichlo
TMview (https://www.tmdn.org/tmview/welcome) to the rescue!
Are "Maemo trademark" and "Maemo logo copyright" the same thing?
EDIT: This is a genuine question. IANAL and do not fully understand how these things work.
The word "maemo" is trademarked *as a word*, i.e. not maemo.org, not icon, not logo, no nothing except for the word.
The question still remains about who owns the "maemo.org" logo we all see on our screen right now. I have the feeling that even if someone uses the logo without explicit authorisation nobody (i.e. owner) is going to come and sue him, unless it's a company the name of which I dare not mention for various reasons, which I can also not speak of.
| The Following User Says Thank You to reinob For This Useful Post: | ||
BR,
AJ