If the Americans elect him to the white House I will officially Question the future of that country

Weird, never heard of Jainist atrocities, maybe when pacifism and non-violence is so built into your ideology that you sweep the ground you step on to not hurt any ants it can work (yeah, buddist massacres are quite known, but never heard of jainist examples, so there, at least one)

If the standoff will be between him and goldman sachs candidate, he really looks like the better option, GS can't buy him, while she's in their pocket (received 600k$ in speaking fees from them in one year, when wall street ties come up she brings up 9/11, lol) and her top contributors:
Citigroup Inc $824,402 $816,402 $8,000
Goldman Sachs $760,740 $750,740 $10,000
DLA Piper $700,530 $673,530 $27,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $696,456 $693,456 $3,000
Morgan Stanley $636,564 $631,564 $5,000
EMILY's List $609,684 $605,764 $3,920
Time Warner $501,831 $476,831 $25,000
Skadden, Arps et al $469,290 $464,790 $4,500
University of California $417,327 $417,327 $0
Sullivan & Cromwell $369,150 $369,150 $0
Akin, Gump et al $364,478 $360,978 $3,500
Lehman Brothers $362,853 $359,853 $3,000

Clinton is pandering for minority and female votes whilst Sanders is asking voters to think. In this modern age wherein everything has to be hand fed to the audience, asking them to think - minority or not - is a dangerous tactic to employ (read: voters do not like to think).