Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (5)
to General by teroyk - 5 days, 10 hrs ago -
Extra softwares in Sailfish using CLI, repositories, etc (118)
to SailfishOS by nieldk - 5 days, 16 hrs ago -
Paths (0)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by teroyk - 6 days, 13 hrs ago - more...
|
2010-03-07
, 01:35
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 40 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#42
|
???? i'm kinda shocked at all the response lol
Yes i would pay extra for both of the upgrades. I never use my stylus anyways and i rather have multi touch. I fact i would call the n900 the perfect device if it had a capacitive screen.
IMHO capacitive>resistence
Yes i would pay extra for both of the upgrades. I never use my stylus anyways and i rather have multi touch. I fact i would call the n900 the perfect device if it had a capacitive screen.
IMHO capacitive>resistence
| The Following User Says Thank You to thinh For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2010-03-07
, 01:54
|
|
Posts: 240 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#43
|
Originally Posted by TheThane
How about cortex a9 + 512mb ram + MeeGo?
N9000!
N900 hardware is good, yes dual core cortex a9 is dream but the very problem of n900 is the beta os.
Now cortex a9 + 512mb ram + maemo 5 nothing changes.
No official mms
No videocall (2010 -.-)
Old app interface (not look good), desktop and app menu is good.
Bad call system, user esperience not very good
Not fluid scroll
Mail app very bad!!
miss portrait
ecc.. ecc.. ecc..
__________________
If I helped you, please use the Thank button.
If I helped you, please use the Thank button.
 |
|
2010-03-07
, 01:55
|
|
Posts: 551 |
Thanked: 507 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North West England
|
#44
|
Would I upgrade? In a word, no.
 |
|
2010-03-07
, 03:48
|
|
Posts: 819 |
Thanked: 806 times |
Joined on Jun 2009
@ Oxnard, Ca.
|
#45
|
No but i would pay for one of those stantum screens and meego.
|
|
2010-03-07
, 10:04
|
|
Posts: 120 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#46
|
Yes I would pay for both.
I prefer AMOLED for clearer, brighter image plus improved battery life and I prefer the sensitivity and multi-touch capability of capacitive screens.
I prefer AMOLED for clearer, brighter image plus improved battery life and I prefer the sensitivity and multi-touch capability of capacitive screens.
 |
|
2010-03-07
, 10:51
|
|
Posts: 232 |
Thanked: 44 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Austria, Amstetten
|
#47
|
rofl.... i havent told you my answer....^^
so....
i would pay for amoled.... -> battery , breakproof, and better colors....
i would pay for capacitive too -> scratchproof, no preasure just swiping, maybe multitouch ....
i would also pay for at least a scratchproof layer on my resistive touchscreen ....
so....
i would pay for amoled.... -> battery , breakproof, and better colors....
i would pay for capacitive too -> scratchproof, no preasure just swiping, maybe multitouch ....
i would also pay for at least a scratchproof layer on my resistive touchscreen ....
| The Following User Says Thank You to ~phoenix~ For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2010-03-07
, 11:00
|
|
Posts: 91 |
Thanked: 38 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Copenhagen, Denmark
|
#48
|
Amoled yes (saves battery and looks pretty)
Capacitive NO (ruins precision and brings NO advantage I can see)
Capacitive NO (ruins precision and brings NO advantage I can see)
__________________
Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
- Elbert Hubbard
Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
- Elbert Hubbard
|
|
2010-03-07
, 11:22
|
|
Posts: 176 |
Thanked: 149 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#49
|
I wouldn't pay for either as an upgrade but I would take the AMOLED multitouch in a heartbeat in a new device. However I still wouldn't want the low res capacitative for input.
 |
|
2010-03-07
, 11:38
|
|
Posts: 909 |
Thanked: 216 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Bremen, Germany
|
#50
|
i would not.
a lot of parts of the OS are not really finger-friendly, so losing he stylus will definitely be a loss.
also, in my opinion, capacitive-screen-devices are just too sensitive. when i use a friends phone (which has a capacitive screen) i permanently click stuff by accident.
this maybe because i'm generally not used to capacitive screens, as i never actually owned a capacitive-screen-device (all devices i owned have resistive screens), but still its just inconvenient to me.
a lot of parts of the OS are not really finger-friendly, so losing he stylus will definitely be a loss.
also, in my opinion, capacitive-screen-devices are just too sensitive. when i use a friends phone (which has a capacitive screen) i permanently click stuff by accident.
this maybe because i'm generally not used to capacitive screens, as i never actually owned a capacitive-screen-device (all devices i owned have resistive screens), but still its just inconvenient to me.
N900 hardware is good, yes dual core cortex a9 is dream but the very problem of n900 is the beta os.
Now cortex a9 + 512mb ram + maemo 5 nothing changes.
No official mms
No videocall (2010 -.-)
Old app interface (not look good), desktop and app menu is good.
Bad call system, user esperience not very good
Not fluid scroll
Mail app very bad!!
miss portrait
ecc.. ecc.. ecc..