The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to moo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-02
, 15:46
|
Posts: 323 |
Thanked: 180 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Gent, Belgium
|
#2
|
|
2010-01-02
, 15:59
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 23 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London
|
#3
|
|
2010-01-02
, 16:16
|
|
Posts: 861 |
Thanked: 734 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Nomadic
|
#4
|
|
2010-01-02
, 16:23
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Germany
|
#5
|
|
2010-01-02
, 16:45
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#6
|
|
2010-01-02
, 16:53
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 49 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Tampere, Finland
|
#7
|
iltalehti.fi
Finnish tabloid web site with lots of images.
microB: Ok
Fennec: Grinds to halt, unusable slow
|
2010-01-02
, 17:19
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Helsinki
|
#8
|
Great comparison !
Could you in your comparison also include Midori as a alternative, Webkit based browser ? I'm sure lots of people (including me) would like a well written comparison including that one as well.
|
2010-01-02
, 17:20
|
Posts: 129 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Mboro - UK
|
#9
|
|
2010-01-02
, 17:25
|
|
Posts: 880 |
Thanked: 264 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Cambridge, UK
|
#10
|
I installed Firefox Fennec RC1 and wrote down some initial thoughts about it versus microB here:
http://blog.twinapex.fi/2010/01/02/m...irefox-fennec/
If you are considering starting to use Fennec I recommend to read the blog.
-Mikko