|
2010-02-06
, 12:16
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#2
|
So many of these "Apps" would not even make it through the extras QA.
[...]
In some respects its worse for end users to download from there than from Extras-Dev.
|
2010-02-06
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 77 |
Thanked: 85 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Italy
|
#3
|
|
2010-02-06
, 14:45
|
Posts: 52 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ London, UK
|
#4
|
|
2010-02-06
, 14:46
|
Posts: 210 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#5
|
|
2010-02-06
, 15:01
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#6
|
|
2010-02-06
, 15:14
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#7
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-06
, 15:36
|
Posts: 1,086 |
Thanked: 2,964 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#8
|
|
2010-02-06
, 15:39
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#9
|
I never thought of it that way but yes, you're right. I remember before the Ovi disaster started, I read between the lines here how some people felt they'd need to really improve quality in Extras so the community repository wouldn't be too far behind its big brother.
Alot of the apps in Ovi store are either non optified ,Wikisuvival ect, or have dual library dependancies. Then theres the MMS pictures for sale and music that cannot be played.
So many of these "Apps" would not even make it through the extras QA.
Surely someone should be moderating this store.
In some respects its worse for end users to download from there than from Extras-Dev.