danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,632 | Thanked: 5,384 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#1361
Originally Posted by Chuck Norris View Post
Cutting R&D is the only way. NOkia can't cover the loses and from a stock perspective and short term its the way to go. Nokia don't have maemo meego and leaving Symbian behind. The R&D at nokia is way to expensive for Nokia's new costume. Add to that the they get the OS from Microsoft and more staff needs to leave. Nokia simply not need that much people since nokia will not be that the big anymore. You can't live in the past when your income and sales generated more money. So from my perspective its the way. Cut hard and fast. And when the company can afford it expand, do it.
Here's another way--don't undercut your existing products even while you still depend on them.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
--
Galaxy Nexus ("toro", Android 4.1.2, AOKP JB Milestone 1)
Asus Nexus 7 ("grouper", Android 4.2, stock)
 
Posts: 639 | Thanked: 632 times | Joined on Oct 2011
#1362
Nokia cutting R&D to survive is like General Motors cutting off its ability to develop new car models and selling rebadged Hyundai to survive. Nokia may survive but as a shadow of its former self selling phones designed by others that it has no control over.
 
Posts: 516 | Thanked: 1,002 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#1363
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
Here's another way--don't undercut your existing products even while you still depend on them.
So how you u hndle the negative result every Q? How would you handle the value of the company?

You know you can't go on with the costs of all the things you have today??

Last edited by Chuck Norris; 05-30-2012 at 03:50 AM.
 
Posts: 131 | Thanked: 98 times | Joined on Nov 2011
#1364
Originally Posted by Chuck Norris View Post
Cutting R&D is the only way. NOkia can't cover the loses and from a stock perspective and short term its the way to go. Nokia don't have maemo meego and leaving Symbian behind. The R&D at nokia is way to expensive for Nokia's new costume. Add to that the they get the OS from Microsoft and more staff needs to leave. Nokia simply not need that much people since nokia will not be that the big anymore. You can't live in the past when your income and sales generated more money. So from my perspective its the way. Cut hard and fast. And when the company can afford it expand, do it.
I think you're totally missing the point. Of course, if they don't have their own OS they don't need as much R&D, but that's my point. They aren't using their own OS anymore, so therefore it's going to be harder to innovate - as any innovations they DO develop will need to be written in to WP - but also, because they have cut back on R&D, the innovations will be few and far between
 
Posts: 516 | Thanked: 1,002 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#1365
Originally Posted by Dared View Post
I think you're totally missing the point. Of course, if they don't have their own OS they don't need as much R&D, but that's my point. They aren't using their own OS anymore, so therefore it's going to be harder to innovate - as any innovations they DO develop will need to be written in to WP - but also, because they have cut back on R&D, the innovations will be few and far between
The decision is already made. Its Windows! Nokia will not run innovation for a few years. Now its back to basics, cuting costs and get the balance in order and eventually the stock prize will slowly grow. When that is done, no matter how small the company is, start from that, and invest in R&D and other areas.
 
Posts: 423 | Thanked: 415 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#1366
Nokia is not a software company. They can not compete with more competitive companies. They were fine when nobody cared about Taliban phones, but as soon as money was to be made, big boys came in and whipped Nokia and exposed Nokia for what it is not. Nokia is not a software company.
 
Posts: 17 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2011
#1367
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
Nokia is not a software company. They can not compete with more competitive companies. They were fine when nobody cared about Taliban phones, but as soon as money was to be made, big boys came in and whipped Nokia and exposed Nokia for what it is not. Nokia is not a software company.
MeeGo Harmattan is open source
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,632 | Thanked: 5,384 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#1368
Originally Posted by gosh View Post
MeeGo Harmattan is open source
No. hehe... just. No, it's not. It is truly open-core: lots of open-source, held hostage by lots of closed-source. You really should read some of the various threads where this was already hashed out.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR
--
Galaxy Nexus ("toro", Android 4.1.2, AOKP JB Milestone 1)
Asus Nexus 7 ("grouper", Android 4.2, stock)
 
Posts: 17 | Thanked: 28 times | Joined on Oct 2011
#1369
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
No. hehe... just. No, it's not. It is truly open-core: lots of open-source, held hostage by lots of closed-source. You really should read some of the various threads where this was already hashed out.
Do you mean that linux is closed source? MeeGo Harmattan is based on linux. And you can't compare operating systems with applications
 
erendorn's Avatar
Posts: 737 | Thanked: 968 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ London
#1370
Originally Posted by gosh View Post
Do you mean that linux is closed source? MeeGo Harmattan is based on linux. And you can't compare operating systems with applications
Linux is open source, but then, it's a kernel, and not an operating system.
The complete UI of Harmattan is closed source, not just its apps, and so are many of it's drivers (graphic drivers for sure, and probably battery and cellular drivers). Now without that the N9 is a beautifull (open source) brick.

Mer+Meego is open source (almost, their are still redistributable closed binary drivers), mer+cordia or whatever else are too. Harmattan is not. A simple test would be just trying to port it to some other device...
 
Closed Thread

Tags
goodbye nokia, investing, last quotes, lumiatard, samsung, specc=ericsson, stock, the elop flop, the flop elop, tizen

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.