Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#51
Originally Posted by Creamy Goodness View Post
yeah, i won't show any joy if they give us a single-color LED after spoiling us with the "rgb" one on the n900. looks like I want a RM-716, but I have no idea what it is
You find the N900 LED impressive ? You obviously have not seen the N810 LED. That one was the mother of all LEDs - it was RGB(ish) but the kicker was that it was so strong there were reports of people not being able to sleep because of it.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#52
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
You find the N900 LED impressive ? You obviously have not seen the N810 LED. That one was the mother of all LEDs - it was RGB(ish) but the kicker was that it was so strong there were reports of people not being able to sleep because of it.
Not to mention that the position of the LED on the corner of the device meant placing an N810 face down did little to subdue the light show. I once awoke confused as to why a lightning storm could possibly be so blue.

Darn email.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 289 | Thanked: 560 times | Joined on May 2009 @ Tampere, Finland
#53
Interesting, RM-716 is a new one. Others I've bumped into are

- RX-71
- RM-581
- RM-660
- RM-680
- RM-690
- RM-696.

Edit: A bit of googling with RM-716 also reveals an RM-742.

In the bigger scheme of things I think the abundance of unearthed product codes would go to show that they're planning on ramping up from the one Maemo/MeeGo model a year even though it's likely that not all of those listed above will end up in the market.

Could it possibly be that we have finally solved the great mystery of RX-71? This file reveals us this:

Code:
#define PRODUCT_RX71_STR                "RX-71" /**< Development board */
It's of course possible that it was supposed to get to the market but maybe got scrapped at some point and relegated to a dev device.

Last edited by jsa; 2011-02-07 at 15:32.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jsa For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,141 | Thanked: 781 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Magical Unicorn Land
#54
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
You find the N900 LED impressive ? You obviously have not seen the N810 LED. That one was the mother of all LEDs - it was RGB(ish) but the kicker was that it was so strong there were reports of people not being able to sleep because of it.
When I disabled the light sensor module on my N900 the LED became super bright. I slept in a hotel near an airport and I thought the flashing lights were from cars and airplanes, until I realized it was the yellow charging light on my N900 lighting up the room.
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 161 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#55
RX should be the NLine device ... RX-51 anyone?

the RM i dont think jives with what we want, on this board.

the RX-71 seems like a successor to the N900.

i hope that they cram a few more things other than mfld in the device, although now that aava has one, i kinda want one too :P
 
Posts: 289 | Thanked: 560 times | Joined on May 2009 @ Tampere, Finland
#56
Originally Posted by shady View Post
the RM i dont think jives with what we want, on this board.
Nokia doesn't seem to separate Linux and other devices with the RX and RM anymore. All those listed above are dug out from Meego sources, Linux kernel sources, bug reports etc. so they are or have been Maemo/MeeGo devices/dev boards.

Last edited by jsa; 2011-02-07 at 17:18.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jsa For This Useful Post:
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#57
Originally Posted by shady View Post
RX should be the NLine device ... RX-51 anyone?

the RM i dont think jives with what we want, on this board.
RX was used for Maemo devices. The X may have stood for "experimental" for all I know.

Signs are that MeeGo devices have moved mainstream enough that they will be designated with RM.

the RX-71 seems like a successor to the N900.
That was certainly true two years ago. Whatever it is or was, odds are its hardware wouldn't seem so exciting today.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
tissot's Avatar
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#58
Originally Posted by shady View Post
RX should be the NLine device ... RX-51 anyone?

the RM i dont think jives with what we want, on this board.

the RX-71 seems like a successor to the N900.

i hope that they cram a few more things other than mfld in the device, although now that aava has one, i kinda want one too :P
RX-71 wont see the day of light. RX-51 and RX-71 where out to be seen in code or in bug lists already in 2009.
RX-71 is just used for a development, just like RX-51/N900 is used in many cases.

Or they will be releasing some very very old hw.

EDIT: Seems like both jsa and sjgadsby got there first.

Last edited by tissot; 2011-02-07 at 17:20.
 
Posts: 1,463 | Thanked: 1,916 times | Joined on Feb 2008 @ Edmonton, AB
#59
this should prove iCDK has working hdmi output, 720p
https://bugs.meego.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10559
(well, trying to work )
doesn't really prove iCDK is a phone though. Actually the test results for iCDK always say 3g hardware is not available, so I guess it's not a phone yet.

Last edited by Creamy Goodness; 2011-02-09 at 00:03.
 
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#60
Well in light of the recent sad developments....
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/08/n...honest-burnin/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/09/e...-announcement/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/10/n...-well-be-ther/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...eorganization/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...ing-this-year/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...ndows-phone-b/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...ransition-yea/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...s-phone-devel/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/l...l-markets-day/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/s...-in-employmen/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...ndroid-explor/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...turkeys-tweet/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/rip-symbian/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...ndows-phone-7/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/11/n...cement-online/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/n...et-chris-webe/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/n...rise-to-intel/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/12/w...congress-2011/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/l...a-at-mwc-2011/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/n...ice-this-year/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/13/n...ating-android/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/i...ve-longest-us/
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/14/l...-2011-keynote/
and frustrated devs
http://blog.mardy.it/2011/02/committed-to-linux.html
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...013#post944013
Do ya'll think we can still expect even just one decent successor to the N900?
I'll be pissed if it's a slate with no qwerty or worse, a tablet.
But I'll buy irrespective, if only to keep the torch burning.
 
Reply

Tags
armchairanalyst

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:59.