Active Topics
-
Nokia Booklet 3G (RX-75) Drivers (60)
to Alternatives by Maemish - 8 hrs, 12 mins ago -
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (7)
to General by teroyk - 3 days, 4 hrs ago - more...
| The Following User Says Thank You to gianko For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-01-03
, 17:09
|
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
@ a spot
|
#2
|
I would love to know too!
| The Following User Says Thank You to GigaByte For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2012-01-04
, 02:57
|
|
Posts: 185 |
Thanked: 111 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ Mexico DF, Mexico
|
#3
|
I've tested BFS and at the same OC settings than KP and it just kept crashing while KP has been way more stable, even with VDD 1 & 2 enabled + DSP OC'ing.
__________________
Linux Registered User # 492214
http://counter.li.org/
------------------------
N900 registered as Linux Machine # 426325
Linux Registered User # 492214
http://counter.li.org/
------------------------
N900 registered as Linux Machine # 426325
| The Following User Says Thank You to strange1712 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-04
, 11:52
|
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#4
|
BFS lags on UI, despite supposedly prioritising userspace stuff (problem is somewhere in Maemo - it works really nice on Archlinux and kernel 3.0)
__________________
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
N9 PR 1.3 Open Mode + kernel-plus for Harmattan
@kenweknot, working on Glacier for Nemo.
|
|
2012-01-04
, 12:09
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#5
|
I've tested BFS and at the same OC settings than KP and it never crashed.
I think that people who wonder which is better should try both and report the results.
I think that people who wonder which is better should try both and report the results.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
| The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-04
, 12:58
|
|
Posts: 124 |
Thanked: 105 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#6
|
I appreciate the work that went into BFS kernel, it's the kind of stuff that makes n900 awesome.
But sadly like Hurrian I find UI laggy with that kernel, even o/cd to 950.
But sadly like Hurrian I find UI laggy with that kernel, even o/cd to 950.
| The Following User Says Thank You to nman For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-01-04
, 18:07
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by nman
what do you appreciate in particular of bfs kernel?
I appreciate the work that went into BFS kernel, it's the kind of stuff that makes n900 awesome.
| The Following User Says Thank You to gianko For This Useful Post: | ||
 |
|
2012-01-06
, 00:22
|
|
Posts: 113 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ london
|
#8
|
i actually find that ui interactions with bfs kernel to be more snappier then power kernel, single app execution feels slightly faster and bfs chokes less when multi tasking... however it does create a strange flickering effect when using opera and theres inconsistant vibrations also my n900 is overclocked to 500mhz to 1100mhz and transition speed are set to zero.
__________________
Pika Boo! its the linux monster... Ahhh run away LoL
Pika Boo! its the linux monster... Ahhh run away LoL
|
|
2012-01-09
, 14:54
|
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#9
|
im interested more in the power saving rather than overclocking, wich one is better for long battery duration (assuming to use smartreflex without overclocking)?
i heard that bfs is not compatible with batterypatch, why? maybe because bfs makes the same things that batterypatch do?
i heard that bfs is not compatible with batterypatch, why? maybe because bfs makes the same things that batterypatch do?
|
|
2012-01-10
, 04:57
|
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#10
|
Batterypatch is poorly regarded as a kludge by more sophisticated users than me, so when it was noted that BFS isn't compatible, no real inquiry was made into fixing the problem because nobody cared.
BTW: it appears that the BFS development is being abandoned shortly unless someone new picks it up.
BTW: it appears that the BFS development is being abandoned shortly unless someone new picks it up.
__________________
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
All I want is 40 acres, a mule, and Xterm.
The main purpose of this topic is to understand why some users prefer to use Kernel BFS and why others prefer the Kernel Power.
In which situation the Bfs performs better than the Power or viceversa? and for what purposes we should choose one instead of the other?
Which one is more stable?
pros and cons?