![]() |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
So I use my Treo650 for my basic calendar etc and I enjoy the easy ability to just beam or send contacts,events, business cards etc to my 'spare' TX, or a business associates who are using various versions of the PalmOS. My efforts on my N800 just have not worked. TreoMemo and Tealscript are two well done programs I found very useful and would love to see working well in the N series in some way. While I love the intelligent simplicity of the Palm appearances, I really do like our Nseries interface. So for media play and a few other good apps, the IT N800 is still a fine fun gadget, yet I wish it could realize its fuller potential before the gang at Nokia ditch it and move on which according to the latest notions is likely not too far off. :rolleyes: RIP 770. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
To be honest, I'd be thrilled if the n800 could transparently run all palm applications. Tilt it sideways, and give me the 755p functionality, and interface, including being able to dial my cell phone from the n800, and I might consider giving up my treo. The more and more I think about it, though, the more I really just appreciate the n800 for what it is. It's a reasonable media player/ebook reader, and a great little toy for browsing the "rich" web. Those are two areas that treos stink at, and two areas that I love the tablet for. Unless Nokia is trying to move the n800 into the enterprise marketplace, something like GPE will be just fine, and will suit the needs of most of it's users. I think if Nokia focuses on improving the web experience, and media aspects of the tablet, it could be an incredible device. Moving into the enterprise PIM market would just divert focus from improving those two things, IMO. I think the tablet's priorities should be: A. Improve web browsing speed. It's certainly currently usable, but by no means fast. I want desktop-like speed. Sites like Google reader and Google mail are just slow. Scaling the screen is slow. Opening new browser windows is slow. B. Improve the media player. Canola2 is pretty skin on not much meat. The default player is a lot more meat with an ugly UI. Mediabox is actually the best interface for the tablet, IMO, just not quite there yet from a capability standpoint. Focus on supporting one effort that combines all of these things into one GOOD player. C. Add support for video chat with MSN, AIM, Yahoo etc. to make that stupid camera actually worthwhile. You fix those three things, and the tablet is a killer toy, even bordering on a useful tool. Trying to breach the enterprise PIM market is just spinning your wheels and trying to make the n800 something it currently isn't. Make it excellent at what it is (which I'd argue it currently isn't), and THEN focus on changing what it does. Until then, let the GPE crowd keep working on GPE, and make it accessible to the masses. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Another possible factor here is that Nokia still wants to sell phones, and most phones have PIM stuff on them. If you have a Nokia phone, you don't need other PIMs, so why bother to put them on the N8*0? Poor logic, and I don't maintain PIM infor on my phone, but it may be some of the thinking. The only thing I have on my phone is phone numbers - I don't use the calendar or anything else, because it's too much trouble on a tiny device, and I can't sync it to my PC, so it's useless for me. Give me robust PIM support and a good password manager that can import my current passwords, and I can give up my Palm. My phone won't cut the mustard, and I don't want a smartphone, or a data plan.
|
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
Personally, if my treo could browse the real web properly, had one more SDHC slot, ran an OS that allowed real multitasking, and had a bigger screen, the nokia would be pretty much pointless, as the treo does everything the n800 does and then some. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
It's like having a TV with a built in DVD player. I have a $4000 television, and a $200 DVD player. I would not want the DVD player built into the TV for the same reason -- DVD players wear out faster than televisions. Some things should not be combined. That being said, if the n810 had 80 GB of storage instead of 4 GB of storage, I would not mind getting rid of my MP3 player. At 4 GB of storage, being able to play music on it is pretty much a useless gimmick, the same as being able to play music on my Palm. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
I would carry two devices, but one point is that I don't want to _haul_ around two devices: I want the phone to be small. Cheap. No smartphone for me please, they're uncomfortable compromises.
|
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
If Garnet would work correctly without crashing my N800 I could carry 1 less device around. My cell phone is eligible for an upgrade in a few months and i'm considering getting a Treo since damn Garnet won't work properly. At least then I can leave my Palm at home. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
As far as the DVD player analogy, that's kinda silly. The DVD player isn't integral to the functioning of the TV. If it stops working, you just buy another 200 dollar DVD player and hook it up. On top of that, it doesn't really apply to the discussion, since all-in-one devices are what the n800 is trying to replicate, IMO. More things stuck in one box are a GOOD thing in this discussion. If not, why does it have anything more than just a web browser? Why does anyone want a PIM on one? By your logic, you're better served by a separate palm pilot, cell phone, n800, iPod, digital camera, memory stick, portable DVD player, laptop, etc. Yes, smartphones are a compromise, but EVERYTHING in the mobile world is a compromise. That's the price for putting big capabilities in a small package. I find the treo a very good compromise. It really doesn't take up much more space than a regular cell phone, and I've got access to all my appointments, e-mail, calendar etc. all the time. Not to mention the host of other things it brings to the table. Outside of a bigger screen, the only real thing that the n800 does better is browse the web, honestly. And that's perfectly ok, because that's why I bought it. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
As for separate MP3 player and palmtop, that's what I have now, not because it should be that way, but because the n810 has negligible storage. If it had a 80GB drive, I could stop carrying my equally-expensive MP3 player around. But that's tangential to the topic at hand, which pertains to Palms, and if Palm users can switch to the n810. To sum up *that* discussion, the answer is "no" -- the n810 does not duplicate any of the core functionality of a Palm made since 2000, not because the n810 hardware is lacking, but because the n810 software is lacking, and in all likelihood will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. |
Re: Palm user: is it time to move to the Nxxx?
Quote:
So, syncing between N800 and Palm Desktop and then between Desktop and Google. Not ideal, but pretty good I think. Neil |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:07. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8