![]() |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Other guy says "Well, you usually get what you pay for. Ranting about poor descriptions of free software seems just a tad juvenile to me, but maybe that's just me."
I have to disagree with the your point that the poor descriptions are inherent in either free software or in Linux. I've been a Linux user for more than a decade and I've never seen program descriptions in the RedHat/Fedora community that are as bad as the descriptions for the Maemo/N800 tablet packages. Go read http://www.freshmeat.net and you very rarely see a description of the form "flite is a hacked-up version of flite" or such. Compare that with the description you see on the Fedora 8 Linux version of flite. Here's output from "rpm -qi flite" Name : flite Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.3 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 8.fc7 Build Date: Tue 14 Nov 2006 11:57:48 AM CST Install Date: Sat 15 Dec 2007 04:41:35 PM CST Build Host: hammer2.fedora.redhat.com Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: flite-1.3-8.fc7.src.rpm Size : 10483102 License: BSD-style Signature : DSA/SHA1, Fri 18 May 2007 01:22:00 PM CDT, Key ID b44269d04f2a6fd2 Packager : Fedora Project <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> URL : http://fife.speech.cs.cmu.edu/flite/ Summary : Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) Description : Flite (festival-lite) is a small, fast run-time speech synthesis engine developed at CMU and primarily designed for small embedded machines and/or large servers. Flite is designed as an alternative synthesis engine to Festival for voices built using the FestVox suite of voice building tools. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I find myself wondering why the flite debian package for Maemo does not have a similarly rich description. Are the online descriptions in the Maemo repositories taken from the build script files (in RPM systems, these are called "spec" files, I don't know what Debian calls them) with which the deb packages are built? Or are they just "off the top of my head" lines that package owners type in when they register projects? PJ |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
I've spent hours and hours compiling tons of software for the tablets, by the time I have them running on my N800, I don't generally care to add a description. Of course the people who grab my packages know darn well what it is they're downloading, since I usually post them in response to a thread here in the forums :) Descriptions are typically "off the top of my head", but sometimes the author will include a debian/control file which has a proper description, so no extra copy/paste/description writing is necessary. |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
Code:
Description: A small run-time speech synthesis engineWhat people put in the descriptions on the sites where packages resides I'm not sure. Possibly just some single line description, not in any way extracted from the package description itself. |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
Learn to live by your own rules first before spewing meaningless venom and equally meaningless geeky attitude. It doesn't help anyone, least of all Linux and the free stuff. Users have every right to ask for features, free or not - and the poster did ask very nicely. To get that age old - 'its free stuff' rant is now passe. Try a new line please. |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
Quote:
by the way, hildergranommgeltigat.deb.so and libneedlenardlenoo.so.0 are still in beta, but the source codes are being distributed to those who attend the advanced sarcasm class. |
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
|
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
So does that mean the sense-of-humor-impaired can never get sarcasm? Seems like discrimination to me. Any lawyers around?
|
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
|
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
|
Re: Why all these different Map programs?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:19. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8