![]() |
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
Even with a bit rate of 320kbit/s, a file converted from wav to mp3 will take up about 1/5 of the original space in most cases. Quote:
Can you run OS2008 on the 770 ? The 770 is not much more than two years old, but you can simply forget it, as it's very likely that there won't be OS2008 for the 770 at all. All what's offered is a so-called 'Hacker Edition', which has its own shortcomings, like certain things not working as before... Quote:
Ok I have an N810 now (very nice machine BTW), but will it still be supported next year ? Ray |
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
|
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
For what it is worth, I bought an iPod Touch and returned it after a week of use. I even had it jailbroken.
I thought the web experience was below par, the N810's is much better. The keyboard on the touch just wasn't great with my bigger fingers. I found the music playback functions to not be up to standard either. You would need to look at the touch directly to change volume or track. Canola on the 810 is a much better player. My humble vote is for the 810. David |
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
Still haven't bought anything btw- I was tempted to buy a touch when the price dropped to 350 for a couple of days a week or so ago. I have been pestering CircuitCity for a n810 price match on and off for the last 2 weeks. So far they won't budge- but there is a second retail store I am going to hit up sometime this week. |
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
|
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
Quote:
|
Re: N810 vs. Ipod Touch
OK- debate over. n810 dropped $50 bucks, and as a result it should be arriving in a few weeks. Thanks all!
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 22:49. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8