![]() |
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Will a simple "No" suffice?
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
I've done a compilation of changelogs and this is the result.
From diablo 23-14 image, installing the 30-2 update (using dist-upgrade) |
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
As a software developer myself, in a company using both internal as well as external changelogs and bug tracking systems, I can only agree with GA. I'm wondering what kind of tools the Nokia developers are using? I mean, there's no need for Star Trek technology to create useful changelogs. Even such simple, standard tools as emacs and xemacs have ctrl-x 4-a or meta-x add-changelog-entry, which allows for _EASY_ insertion of things like:
Code:
* filename: Fix for buffer overflow when processing html attachment (NB#1234) |
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Hmm....
Quote:
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Quote:
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Quote:
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
When you sue someone for breaking the GPL, it is to make them stop distributing code which breaks the GPL. That's what you sue for, there's no monetary issues involved as the GPL'ed code is free as in beer. IANAL, but check out all those earlier cases - it's always about getting the offending distributor to stop what they're doing and do something else instead (that is, something legal). Which it appears Nokia has already done, so there's nothing to sue for anymore.
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Quote:
|
Re: First Diablo SSU update is out (4.2008.30-2)
Quote:
Of course, all this closed code from Nokia is not to their advantage IMO. Some of it is due to other vendors (TI stuff etc), but what about e.g. that original email application? For example. (Bits were open, but not enough to use for coders.) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8