Re: "Fixed in Fremantle"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peet
(Post 245464)
there has been the expectation that (...) Nokia would commit enough resources to 1) take the mobile platform design forward
|
Work in progress. Fremantle and Harmattan will probably make us see Diablo as we see Bora and Mistral today.
Quote:
, and also to 2) enable the small but growing developer and enthusiast community to maintain new software on the existing hardware.
|
We are commited to http://wiki.maemo.org/Objective:Maemo_variants
About the rest,
Investing more resources having Fremantle fixes available also for Diablo might look like a more sustainable approach but... what if investing heavily in the future releases is actually the best way for Maemo to become really sustainable?
There is not such 'planning early obsoletion'. If you think device manufacturers make better business through obsoletion than through user satisfaction and customer retention, think twice. This sector is simply running fast, very fast. Look around. Not being fast is not very sustainable and to be fast you need to set priorities and make compromises.
On the other hand Maemo SW is funding 3 *masters for community activities and a fourth one is coming (debmaster). We could have less investment done there and more e.g. making Diablo users happier in the short term. But would that be more sustainable?
By prioritizing stronger future releases and a stronger community we fulfill better your 1) 2) points above and (we believe) all we are in a more promising and sustainable Maemo path.
PS: Actually Nokia seems to care about the environment. Longer life for devices is part of this trend, and thanks to Maemo's openness that longer life doesn't depend on Nokia alone.
|