maemo.org - Talk - What we do realistically see in the RX-51

No offense people, it's funny and everything, but could we get back to the topic of this thread now?

Every time I see this thread in the Recent threads list, I'm a little thrilled because somebody might have found a new bit of info about the next-gen tablet...it's a bit of a let-down to see posts like the last few then.

I agree, here is a new home for this stuff.

GeneralAntilles

2009-01-23 22:19

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Quote:

Originally Posted by chlettn (Post 259552)

Every time I see this thread in the Recent threads list, I'm a little thrilled because somebody might have found a new bit of info about the next-gen tablet...it's a bit of a let-down to see posts like the last few then.

What info's to be found by us has largely been found. The next bit you're either gonna spot in the news or on Engadget. ;)

YoDude

2009-01-23 23:44

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles (Post 259561)

What info's to be found by us has largely been found. The next bit you're either gonna spot in the news or on Engadget. ;)

... so, is is RX-51 gonna have spinners or what?

qole	2009-01-23 23:45

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Quote:

Originally Posted by chlettn (Post 259552)

Every time I see this thread in the Recent threads list, I'm a little thrilled because somebody might have found a new bit of info about the next-gen tablet...

Dude! daperl's story is keeping me going here!

Quote:

Originally Posted by chlettn (Post 259552)

No offense people, it's funny and everything, but could we get back to the topic of this thread now? ...it's a bit of a let-down to see posts like the last few then.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles (Post 259561)

What info's to be found by us has largely been found. The next bit you're either gonna spot in the news or on Engadget. ;)

Well, qgil suggested that you've missed something of some significance that is yet to be found by poking around in the non-kernel components of the alpha SDK.

GeneralAntilles

2009-01-24 00:32

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Quote:

Originally Posted by qole (Post 259583)

Well, qgil suggested that you've missed something of some significance that is yet to be found by poking around in the non-kernel components of the alpha SDK.

Don't let those Sith Lords get you, qole. :D

lardman

2009-01-24 10:51

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Where did he say that? Give us a hint so we can target the searching! :)

qole	2009-01-25 04:03

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

I wish we had a more targeted hint. But no, just the comments of the new Sith Lord.

max_power

2009-01-25 14:44

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

I did not follow all of the posts, so i am not sure if this already posted...

i've looked in the "gstreamer0.10-plugins-camera_0.30.tar.gz" and was hopping to find something about the resolution of the camera.
I found in the oamp34xxcam.c

Code:

...

static const gchar *scene_mode_names[] =

{

  "MANUAL", "CLOSEUP", "PORTRAIT", "LANDSCAPE", "UNDERWATER", "SPORT",

  "SNOW_BEACH", "MOOD", "NIGHT_PORTRAIT", "NIGHT_INDOOR", "FIREWORKS"

};

...

v4l2filter requests target format 2592x1944/V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV [v4l2:VIDIOC_S_FMT:V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE]

...

2592x1944 pixel, is this an 5 MPixel resolution?
and i wonder what the "UNDERWATER" profile does ;)

GeneralAntilles

2009-01-25 14:51

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51

Quote:

Originally Posted by max_power (Post 259793)

2592x1944 pixel, is this an 5 MPixel resolution?

Yes, the kernel changelog has quite a lot of information about the hardware.

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00.

Page 17 of 47

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8