Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

@wert613: in general, that what makes the world go 'round ;D
But seriously (and more specifically), the pictures that've been discussed from kaskus forum, those were pictures from a SELLER looking to hawk their goods... they want it to look as pristine and untouched as possible.

You won't see it peeled off unless you can track the buyer :D

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

@ysss: So it IS an entirely profit related reason!

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

lol, in this context yes. I'm gonna text the seller again.. see if i can track down the buer =p

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

Luck to you.

EDIT: And for the record, I love this community because it's made up of mainly witty intelligent NIT users, woo.

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

I just don't get the complaints about the device's appearance. From what I can see I think it looks damn sharp. Good job, Nokia design team.

IMO "fugly" is not an appropriate tag, either...

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

It's not BAD appearance wise, though I see a resemblance to the Samsung Instinct and it's ilk.

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

Won't the x-terminal have an on screen ESC key like current terminal app?

Rich

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

I am always a bit skeptical of these leaks... Don't companies ever do that intentionally?...

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

Some, sure. It's not Nokia's usual style though.

Re: What we do realistically see in the RX-51
 

i think it looks great, i think it suffers for the lack of a fourth numeric row, but that's not an aesthetic problem.