maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Applications (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   WebKit engine for default browser (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=25752)

tso 2009-03-26 20:24

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
no, they use the same libwebkit.

tso 2009-03-26 22:21

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...

Saturn 2009-03-26 23:44

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
Maybe it was answered before and i missed it. But why hns has a different version of the libwebkit from Bandyo? or to be more exact why hns needs to disable some options?

It came to me as I've got the latest stuff from hns and through qole's repo I'm getting an update to the latest (from Bandyo).

Anyways, thank you guys (Bandyo, hns and qole) for making the experience so much better.

Saturn 2009-03-26 23:46

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 274926)
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...

If i understood correctly, it is in the hns' todo list to reimplement this too.

Sho 2009-04-02 18:20

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
This seems rather cool: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/w...il/007253.html

(Short version: An ARM-optimized version of some recent improvements to WebKit's JavaScript engine, improving performance on the NITs and other ARM devices.)

How about whipping up a libwebkit build with this? It's supposed to be fairly stable (it's passing the WebKit regression test suite, anyway).

(Meh, this is a duplicate of my earlier post to the Tear 0.3 thread. Maybe we should have a central libwebkit thread, and separate threads for its frontends.)

tso 2009-05-19 13:05

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
anyone else having interface freeze issues when eunning both this and tear at the same time lately?

hns 2009-05-28 10:19

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tso (Post 274926)
hmm, when kinetic scrolling got reimplemented, did that include the ability to te it via gconf? im playing around with some settings but cant really tell any diff...

Nope, but I'm planning to reimplement that for the next release. (Right, I'm planning a next release... Bundyo's recent libwebkit builds are working pretty well for me, so I guess it's time to release webkit-eal 0.11 soon)

tso 2009-05-28 10:32

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
glad to see there is still life in this :)

tso 2009-06-10 19:28

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
arg, im torn. i find the eal kinetic more tolerable (maybe because i was able to tweak its treshold) but its a bit more buggy then tear at present (crashes to disfunctional microb, wrong titles on backwards longtap)...

enrico 2009-07-13 07:20

Re: WebKit engine for default browser
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by hns (Post 291370)
Nope, but I'm planning to reimplement that for the next release. (Right, I'm planning a next release... Bundyo's recent libwebkit builds are working pretty well for me, so I guess it's time to release webkit-eal 0.11 soon)

looking forward to this release ...:)


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8