![]() |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Quote:
|
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Quote:
PS. The manufacturing batch and/or country might also influence this. Mine is from the UK, debernardis has the same range and from location he's in Italy, Thesandlord seems to have a different range in California... That's why it's so much fun discovering these ranges via user input :) |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Quote:
|
Re: Who dat MAC ?
My N810 has
( Code (under batt.) 0632550 ) WLAN MAC : 00:1D:6E:9B:XX:XX Bluetooth : 00:1D:6E:9D:XX:XX (comments in your pre-ann. thread) Your demo promisies a good work flow ! |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Quote:
YARR! }:^)~ Silly Corrupt |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
n810
WLAN*MAC*address:*00:1D:6E: D5:xx:xx Bluetooth*address:*00:1D:6E: D9:xx:xx |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Quote:
|
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Isn't there a kind soul with a 770 to chime in ? We're on good track with the N810 and N800, but don't have a single 770 MAC :(
@GA: Odd, no reports from that range yet, seems to be 9B for Europe and D5 for North America, but still not enough reports for final conclusions. BT is also important as AFAIK that's the MAC to be seen if you use PAN. |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
British N800:
WLAN MAC: 00:19:4F:9E:XX:XX BT MAC: 00:19:4F:A5:XX:XX |
Re: Who dat MAC ?
Interesting. My newer N800 has a slightly different MAC address from the other US ones (D4 as opposed to D5):
The N800 I got used from a guy in Seattle: Code:
00:19:4F:D4Code:
00:19:4F:D5 |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:52. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8