![]() |
Re: N900 specs revealed
And, I have to ask, what size pants to all of you guys wear?? Unless this forum is all women who always wear skirts or short-shorts (if it is... feel free to PM me anytime... I'm free for dinner, btw ;)), you have some very weird/small/designer? pants.
I don't own a pair of jeans, shorts, or dress-pants that my N810 does not comfortably fit into. (With its softcase, nonetheless! Whilst I have my phone in my other side pocket, and my wallet in a back pocket.) The N810 is in no way, shape, or form, too big to be pocketable, so shush about that, please. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Boy Genius Report's article seems to question why they would bother making it: "Anyone excited for it or are we looking at another IT destined to be lost in a retail wasteland?" NokiaExperts.com says that they like the idea of the tablets but haven't liked using them in the past due to the sluggishness of the processor; and asks if any of their readers actually use them. The negative posts (at least in here) seem to be from people who were really just hoping for an N800 (or N810) with better hardware, and who aren't thrilled that the device is morphing into something only tangentially related to a tablet. Now, as you've mentioned a couple times, this entire thread is all speculation, so yes, it's a bit silly to get all worked up over what may not even be an actual issue. That being said, considering how long people have been waiting for a new tablet from Nokia, with the lack of official information, speculation becomes sustenance. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Don't forget, Rover is 18mm thick: that's about half a centimetre more than an N810. With the smaller width & height it's going to properly look like a brick (as my colleagues' N95s and Sony Ericsson X1 do). |
Re: N900 specs revealed
"it's quite amazing how worked up people get over a somewhat smaller screen. Seriously, if ebook reading is the number one use case and your eyesight is failing, how about getting something with a 6"+ eInk screen? Even prolonged staring at 4.1" will be bad for your eyes."
Yes, you make an excellent point. Clearly, this thread is a powerful argument that I should not sock my money away for anything Nokia is planning to do in the near future, but I should instead opt for a Kindle. Sure, any year now Nokia may return to something I want. When that happens, I will be interested. In the meantime, I'll hang on to my N810 and N800 and put any disposable money I have elsewhere. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
More seriously, if my thumbs aren't busy prodding pixels, they're resting below the screen, not beside it, so on screen controls are closer than the hardware button. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Depending on the pants, I can fit my N800 in them, but it's not with loads of room to spare, and even in my side pocket, I have to remember to take it out when I sit down, lest the extra tightness cause my pants to split like the Incredible Hulk. I envy those of you who have such copious amounts of space in their pockets ;) |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
And, yes, about the keys: you are very right. I usually end up keeping them in the same pocket as my E71 when I have its softcase, and, if I don't, they're usually buttoned up in my breast pocket. (Unless I'm wearing some of my favorite shorts, which usually have an extra, lower, buttonable, pocket on each side where I keep my keys and such.) But... I wouldn't need a tablet + phone if Rover's screen was bigger ;) Edit: And, btw, I would suggest at least trying a pair of those shorts for anyone here, especially if they enjoy bringing their gadgets and such around with them and not looking like a complete nerd :D Besides, they're very well made. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8