![]() |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
EDIT - And on my N800, windowed mode means about 3.8" diagonal. Don't forget that also that the aspect ratio of windowed mode is also not the same as a 3.5" screen. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
I don't need or want a $700 phone. I have the perfect phone and it was free. TI didn't make the OMAP3 so I can sound better to friends and family. And none of you originally came to this forum to talk about phones. If you did, go away.
I have my phone company right where I want them, in that sh*tty little free phone. I'm done writing about phones. It's really boring. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
But wait, we must give people the choice between ALSA and OSS, ESD, aRTs, Pulse, Jack. We must force them to chose for them, because then they are truelly free... and we must allow them their own libc, and their own compiler... we don't do that, right? We provide them the best libc and best compiler for the job because we make their life easier. In some cases we keep in mind the user wants choice, in other we don't keep this in mind or we make it impossible (MSIE, or DRM, ...) Quote:
The tablets were not aimed at specific use cases; or at least their original use cases were abandoned by its users. But now those same users think that will always remain possible with the next Nokia/Maemo product. Impossible. We have people who want to use a capacitive touchscreen with Maemo which requires different applications and UI design choices. We have people who want to use stylus. We have people who do not want 24/7 connectivity. We have people who want big screens for e-books. You simply cannot please everyone! So you vote Red, Blue, or Green. Application managers are always a mess because there are so many overlappings, some are just better sorted than others, but its always hard to make this informative. Users want to be able to know the clear differences between the choices they're able to make. So that is why we have those community and review sites for products, and thats where word of mouth works well. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
It's not about phones, tvs, radios, gps, wifi,wimax, ... but we want everything on the ITs if possible; but we also know that it could not happen at this time. Did someone cry when the N810 did not come out with the FM? I still hate the N810 taking away the internal SD slot! My 12 year old nice still would not trade my N810 for her IPod Touch after I showed her what my N810 could do! So you can see that maybe and maybe Nokia is trying to target a different segment of users and not for geeks any more. If the N900 still support bluetooth I can survive smaller screen size with a bluetooth keyboard but I won't pay a premium for an unlocked phone. Even the N900 will support a better finger interface I still cry for my stylus! But that was me. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Again, no one originally came here to talk about communication technology or how our bits were going to get to point b. WiFi was it. Would you buy this next device if it didn't have WiFi? Would you not buy this next device if it didn't have cell phone technology? If you answered yes to either question, please leave now. Goodbye and good luck.
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
I notice that my screen has a small border in window'd mode, so the diagonal is roughly 3.5", though as you mention the aspect ratio is different. Even given all of this, it still should be adequate to get a feel of interfacing with a smaller screen. YARR! }:^)~ High-Corruptification |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
I think my iPod touch is less voluminous than my phone. I dig that. Is there such a thing as a 3.5" 800X480 capacitive touch screen?
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Hmm, I think I spot a trend here... has the old fad of peppering one's english/american text with a few French expressions suddenly become fashionable again ? Or should I say... "de rigueur" ? :-)
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
You're living in the future. Come back to the present; It's more real and you can actually get things done.
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
The only app I consistently use full screen is FBReader, but I've been using that app more and more. I imagine that with an always-on data connection, I'll use the device for more things (e.g. Maemo mapper), but for now, I mostly use it for reading books. There's no question for me that FBReader in a 3.5" viewing area sucks quite a bit. You can't just increase the font size to compensate: to comfortably read a book, you really want a good overview of the current page. For me, ebook reading is so far the only sacrifice in this beautiful (yet vapourous) convergence device. Linux: awesome. Phone: awesome. Unified addressbook for IM, email and phone: awesome. 48GB of memory: awesome. Camera: awesome. For me, there are so many benefits to the convergence, I'll sacrifice the small screen. I'll even sacrifice the DPad if I can have arrow keys. If there are no arrows or DPad, I'll probably pass. A Linux device isn't all that useful to me without a functioning XTerm. Michael |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Being able to surf anywhere is a transformative experience. It's one of the reasons people tether their existing tablets. The MAJOR benefit now, is that we have the option of doing this without requiring a second device! In fact many of us will do this for the first time.
Once people realize that they can look up recipes while in the grocery store, SSH into their server on the train, video chat on the beach, buy tickets in a cab, snap and send photos at concerts, run automation scripts at the movies, etc. I'm sure they will enjoy the inclusion of a cellular radio and accept the 'pesky' half-inch of screen lost. I believe this device transcends both a smartphone and tablet designation. You see, it runs an OPEN variant of linux. This line of product from Nokia (IMO) represents the finest example of a convergence device. In fact, of all the MIDs and smartphones being released, there's arguably no equal. YARR! }:^)~ Wide Area Corrupt |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
edit - au contraire - got it ;) |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
So, what was the purpose of this experiment? Were you trying to prove that smaller screen is "still ok" or what? Because the miracle you expected has not happened: all the use cases described before in this thread felt constrained and less comfortable. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Fms, Same feeling here ...
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
... and Google expects to have Android on 20 handsets by Q4 2009.
Talk about downward pressure on MSRP. :) *** If Nokia is in fact watching this board and we can somehow influence design and marketing decisions with our posts then it seems that we are really just validating some of their recent moves. Apparently they can just charge whatever they want for a device, no one cares. :) Knowing the US cell phone market some I know that unless you are Steve Jobs, the carrier usually has the final word on a device's "as shipped" specifications. Some of the service providers own people have plenty of colored charts with circles and arrows accompanied by pages of statistics that correlate to what a typical customer from the targeted market prefers. This is what they start the bidding with and 9 times out of 10 that is the final product they end up with. Jobs changed that when he walked in and showed them something that their current products couldn't do and he had his own dang charts with statistics of actual user experience with this new device. The in house people were caught with their charts down because their typical customer had no clue that a cell phone could do the things an iPhone could. This was a one time deal though because Jobs didn't show the Cell phone providers anything that they thought couldn't be done. He just showed them customers who were enthusiastic about doing it. Now the in house chart wranglers have something for a typical customer to compare to and believe me they now have plenty of new statistics. About the only value a community like ours has in these negotiations is in our overall numbers somehow coorelated to user enthusiasm. That is all, (IMHO) *** BTW, this is not my attempt to hi-jack a thread or change the topic to Apple, Stevie Wonder, or the iPhone. The above is just how I based my opinion that the most important spec at this point is price and the amount of new subscribers this phone generates for a service provider may be the biggest influence on Nokia decisions about future Maemo 5 devices. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Just to comment on experimenting the new smaller screen size on N8x0 using windowed mode... that is not exactly correct, since you do lose lots of pixels/resolution... What you should do is to use the N8x0 in full screen mode, just like before, but place the device 1.2x distance further from your eyes that you usually do. Then you'll still be looking same amount of pixels, but looking like you do have them on a 3.5" screen.
(In fact I was surprised that the difference is only 1.2x... Gotta try this when I get home...) |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
YARR! }:^)~ C |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Lots of puzzle pieces here, and dang near a complete picture if one looks. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
The question is not if it is less comfortable for you. We know you value the screen size. The question is if it is acceptable for potential customers, for which percentage of potential customers it is not acceptable, and whether that percentage qualifies for an other product which fullfills their need (an add-on product or a stand-alone product). That is the question for Nokia or anyone else has to make. And they're commercial decisions in almost all cases. We're not all multi-million philantropists like Sean Moss-Pultz. So if we go back to reality 101 the screen size of devices didn't stop people from buying an iPhone or G1 whereas stability and lack of 3G were serious issues in OpenMoko. Stability of 3G in iPhone was also a concern for early adopters; at least here in my country, and TMO was partly to blame for that. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
The year was 1996. Maybe '97. I had to tell the roadrunner web master what a WML mime type was so I could talk to my WiFi connected internet laptap that was sitting on my kitchen table. I was doing dynamic DNS before it was invented. Through said laptop, I was proxying to the internet from my cell phone 12+ years ago. My unlimited Sprint data plan was $5/month. I get convergence, it's just far down on my list 'cause it still comes at a ridiculous premiuim of money, contracts and power consumption. In the meantime, I'll take an excellent WiFi client at a reasonable price.
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
I'm a big fan of gestures, but I don't think they work well to replace arrow keys. First of all, you'd have to have gestures for all of the modified cursor keys. Shift+arrow to select. Ctrl+arrow for moving word by word. You could implement this by allowing (e.g.) shift+gesture, but this will probably be awkward on the bus. So you probably need more than just four directional gestures. Secondly, the gestures would have to be able to handle key repeats. For instance: keep your finger on the screen after the "cursor left" gesture and the cursor keeps moving left until you remove your finger. If you overshoot, or if your gesture is misinterpreted, you now have to correct for the effect of the wrong gesture in addition to re-doing the original gesture. It's like typing in ssh over a slow connection. If your position is off by only three or four characters, you have the choice performing a single cursor movement gesture three or four times, or using a repeat gesture and risking overshooting your target (probably by three or four characters again). That's a lot of physical hand movement as well. I imagine it won't be comfortable. Plus you have to keep moving your hands to and from the keyboard. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=299
The top image shows the difference, and it's a pretty big difference. Photoshop an image onto both of those, or at least use your imagination -- any text or video would look much smaller on that smaller screen. You can't compare it with the unmaximized microb because the text size doesn't change unmaximized, and that's a key item. Could it be compared to viewing with the 80% option on the current N8x0, which I avoid except for (very few) particular websites (formatting is broken otherwise) and really don't want to be stuck to that size? Not accurately, but that might be probably closer to the experience than an unmaximized browser, though we can't accurately say because qgil mentioned that they were creative in this area. Moving the tablet away from your eyes is about the only accurate way, and even that's not equal to the experience. So it's really a guess, (like most of what we've been discussing in this thread). Having said that, I agree with Capt'n Corrupt, that "Being able to surf anywhere is a transformative experience," and I'd like to be wired in wherever I am, but have been working around that until now, and I'm fine with it for the time being. (I have a saved text version of xbox/ xbox 360 backward compatibility list, for example, as a substitute for being connected 24/7). Would I sacrifice 12% of the screen for it? Very grudgingly, but I know and am reminded every day that the N800 screen spoils me. Of course, I personally think most of this discussion is moot; I could be wrong but I think there will be a more tablet-like maemo device. "How soon?" is my only question, based on this post: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...986#post290986 Joe. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
YARR! }:^)~ iCapt'n Corrupt<ESC>:wq |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Also I do recall in threads that most of the people were against having any application open in full screen mode by default. Rather they wanted to use apps in windowed mode with a choice to go full screen if needed - hence that suggests that they also use apps in windowed mode most of the time. I am sure most people do that. So if the 3.5 " screen = windowed mode screen size (or thereabouts), then that seems just fine by me. Of course I understand that the 3.5" screen will now have a windowed mode again thereby reducing app screen real-estate to less than 3.5". But then just go full-screen in that case. I always did like full screened apps like Canola, Flip clock etc ... again, this is entirely a matter of choice - but I guess many of us here who dislike the small screen factor might not be put off once we see the real thing in flesh and metal and LCD parts. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
I also use most apps in windowed mode exclusively with little trouble. From what I understand, Maemo 5 will have an interface to compensate for window'd mode, and knowing that the focus has been largely on usability, it'll probably be comfortable to use. I am very excited for the performance increases, the camera, and the anywhere internet, all on an optimized open linux OS! I just wish it were out already! YARR! }:^)~ cap7'n |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Really. So accelerometer means problem. The only time that happens on my iPod touch is when I'm lying on either side in my bed using the thing. But then someone made a small application which allows me to toggle off the accelerometer. What an invention! You can actually disable a piece of hardware. Accelerometer has been useful in many devices, yes, including auto rotation. Assuming there are no hardware bugs it is still not perfect because by default UI isn't optimized for it, so many applications won't be useful with it. But some are or will be, and it is then important (e-mail for example). Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8