![]() |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Unless the beta testers were all aliens and there is a parallel universe. :) I can't see how a Maemo phone won't need massive amounts of community support. That is why I believe because of price, availability, and the durability of the Diablo devices it will be 3 or 4 months before any veterans of the display wars will contribute any thing meaningful. During that time this community will shrink or only this dang thread will grow and the Maemo phone will go over like a fart in an elevator. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
I suspect Nokia will release it when it's ready. Remember nothing has been announced yet.
By the By: This video shows that the N97 indeed uses a BP-4L battery. It may be an indication that the N900 may use the same (similar size), which could mean a spare battery for most of the folks here who purchase one. YARR! }:^)~ 2Cs |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Finally I could catch up on this long thread (at the expense of my Danish sleeping time).
There was one post that got many thanks that started saying... Quote:
The rest of your post borders pure fantasy though, in the category of Conspiracy Theory. That's ok since being outside of the Maemo team you have no easy way to check the facts. From the inside is clear though that the core people that had a brilliant idea and pursued it through the first Maemo releases and Internet Tablets are more or less the same that are pushing Fremantle, Harmattan and compatible devices. Some concepts and ideas are just the same, some others have naturally evolved with the experience, releases, data acquired, feedback received and lessons learned. Innovation and business as usual. I can't speak for everybody, but I would say all the old-timers involved in Fremantle development think Maemo 5 and the hardware coming with it are the right steps forward. We have never got the kind of discussions you are having here at length and this makes me think that most of you will be just as excited when you get the real stuff we are working on announced, explained and working in your hands. And now I should really go to sleep. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
YARR! }:^)~ 10Cappies |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Thanks, Joe * of course the two are not mutually exclusive. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
No. Same level of crazy. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Back to the lyrics! :)
Tom Petty "crawling back to you" Im so tired of being tired Sure as night will follow day Most things I worry about Never happen anyway EDIT I like this line also from the same song Tryin to say to me That Im gonna be alright, if I believe in you |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
If you want to continue this discussion please do it in a different thread dedicated to it. Thanks! |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
and as you say telephony integration presents several hard challenges - eg there's a several second latency between the network and the UI in SIP/Jingle calls on the current devices, which operators would certainly find unacceptable. Not to mention all the extra hardware, but at least the N97 is beta-testing that for us ;-) But you know, it has to be said that they are doing things right this time. Notice that all of the above components are open source and most have been developed or at least funded by Nokia. Griping about UIs and form factors aside, Fremantle and the devices it will run on are pretty exciting stuff. It takes guts to include all that in a single iteration, and I really hope they can pull it off! |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Yet... we can find numbers of the other N-series sold if we pry hard enough. But this one, in the community nonetheless is a secret. Just doesn't make sense. No canned response so far makes sense either. "Enough"... "growing"... I'm sorry. But it does matter. The Apple G4 Cube saw two internal revisions, two CPU levels... had a cult following; yet it was a flop. The numbers were "hidden" from most in that release mainly because it was a niche release and ultimately a flop. Not saying the NIT's are a flop; but they're not mainstream either. And if Nokia keeps losing money and walk away from the NIT platform, or at least dev further into the NIT platform... not knowing these numbers might be important to give some people an understanding of why things happen in the future. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Thanks Quim and thanks to the nokia maemo team |
Re: N900 specs revealed
I believe that NIT are more or less a FLOP.
Otherwise there would be no good reason to hide the sales numbers. In France almost nobody have ever heard about NIT. The very few geeks who tried it had old versions of Maemo and very few interesting apps, so they believed and told everybody the same things that you can read in every review on the Web : "NIT COULD BE INTERESTING BUT IS USELESS AND SUCKS" - the only thing it can do quite well is web browsing - it can NOT replace a PDA because of no PIM app - it can NOT replace a media player because of poor video (which is not so bad but nobody knows it) - it can NOT replace a handheld computer ... All of this is false, N810 is the best PDA I ever got ... but this is only true because of the community around Maemo. Nokia didn't advertise properly about NITs and focused on an extremely limited use : web browsing via WIFI. But in most cases, we don't have acces to WIFI ... even in Paris streets. And most of the people wouldn't spend so much money just for in bed or sofa or toilets home browsing. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
They "flopped" because very little was spent on promotion. The N800 was actually successful within the limited expectations and support they enjoyed. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
While I think you may be correct, I hope the main reason they won't reveal these numbers is because they are experiencing more success than they want to reveal, along with a Nokia desire to cultivate this business model unharassed. Joe |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
I thought it was power management?? Without this community, there would have been no 810, too many people felt like beta testers, but the community made the devices useful. Not Nokia, they only gave us a buggy base to start from..... |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Going back to your original post #868 - there are no talking points either camp is talking about. Its just the need for voice and a better camera as against the trade-off for a smaller screen that everybody is debating. I don't see any talking points - let alone the "communist" angle slap that you put on. And with the way PDA's/tablet devices are merging with communication devices (its been a long steady trend) and other products like the netbook and kindle like devices are filling in the gaps, it doesn't take a weatherman to know which way the wind blows - antennas or a licked finger in the air notwithstanding. And both sides have valid points - and that the point of a forum rather than trying to label each other with meaningless labels. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
As for the sales numbers, I have in the past also asked Quim for these numbers. He says that he does not have them. I believe him. He is the Marketing Manager for Maemo software, not for Nokia hardware. I also notice perhaps this title has changed?? I keep seeing "Quim Gil Opensource advocate" Perhaps this is for when not representing Nokia? Either way, I don't think there is any large conspiracy to keep the numbers from supporting anyone's talking points. It's just business as usual... |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=10178 Seriously I have been here since January 2006. I have agreed and disagreed with most of the people here, sometime vigorously. We always come back to the thing that keeps us together. I think many people are afraid that this thing that brings us together, might have just left them out. (again all the speculation, Nokia will either deliver or screw the pooch.) Either way, this is not like 2006. In 2006 Nokia 770 was the shITT, nothing even close. 2009 and 2010 are not the same markets. Only time will tell. |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Does any one have any idea on the price of this thing in the UK and would it be sim-free or attached to a network?
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Pinguin, don't poke-poke too much the french gay newbie ... :D He could like it.
Well, as I got my first NIT very recently, all the bugs were already solved, and now the system is a joy to use. I find it more reliable than Win Mo and even Palm OS (since Garnet, it wasn't so reliable anymore). The only thing I could have complained is that when you get the device, it doesn't do much without adding apps, even for basic uses as PIM ... |
Re: N900 specs revealed
Penguinbait, by your logic, haven't we all been beta-testers for a large number of commercial products, especially for software? Granted, those are then fixed by the company in-house, but still ...
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
Re: N900 specs revealed
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8