|
Page 8 of 18 |
|
Prev |
6 7 8
9 10
|
Next
| Last
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
I have compiled a little list of options for Java ME and Java SE, which i would put on brainstorm. i'd like to get a few comments on it here first, though :)
these are mostly options allnameswereout mentioned. i have no idea about the compatibility of open source implementations with the official one. maybe someone could elaborate on that. i also put in the possibilities of nokia porting open source implementations of SE and ME, though i'm not sure that's even realistic, since it would mean effort without being able to say "Java compatible". if you think these options are not even worth mentioning i will leave them out. Proposal 1: Java ME nokia buys Java ME royalities and lets sun port it +) official implementation, official support -) probably quite expensive -) Closed License community ports phoneme more info +) GPL -) no team as of yet -) not "official", so no advertising of MIDP capability -) no info as to how complete this implementation is nokia ports phoneme +-) see above nokia or the community ports a Java SE implementation, and we use smth. like microemu for ME compatibility +-) see above -) might be a bit slower Proposal 2: Java SE nokia buys java SE embedded royalities and lets sun port it +) official implementation, official support -) probably quite expensive -) Closed License community ports OpenJDK/JRE 6 more info +) GPL -) no team as of yet -) not "official", so no advertising -) no info as to how complete this implementation is nokia ports OpenJDK/JRE 6 +-) see above community ports Jalimo +) GPL -) not much activity lately -) no advertising, maybe incomplete |
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Where does Iced Tea fit in with all these options?
|
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Quote:
Quote:
"Simultaneous with the launch of the wiki, we have started to support maemo4. Currently cacao, classpath and SWT are tested and work fine. They have the same features and limitations, as for maemo3. But we hope to improve the support on maemo4, soon. Since maemo moved to gtk2.10 and cairo, we have some more options on this platform." to me, that suggests that even more work will be needed to optimize it for maemo5. granted, the build for chinook might run out of the box ( i haven't read anything from people who got a n900 already, links are welcome :) ). if it does run well, there is no need for this option and i will not add it. though that quote also suggests that there is not much activity any more (this entry is from 2007), and if many people vote maybe that could change and even attract new devs for the project. |
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Quote:
i will add it to the Java SE Proposal: community or nokia builds Iced Tea +) true GPL, no binary components -) no team so far -) no official advertising |
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
the inclusion of Java is essential to offer a complete development platform to all developers not only C, C + +, Python, etc. ..
From this we can think how to integrate Java in Maemo |
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
I just found something on the Nokia Forums: link.
that seems to be an official statement, is there any point in including the "nokia options" in the brainstorm proposal now, qgil? |
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Quote:
|
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
Quote:
|
Re: Java support on N900, the missing thing!!
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:32. |
Page 8 of 18 |
|
Prev |
6 7 8
9 10
|
Next
| Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8