![]() |
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
indeed, ARM != powervr, as thats something that TI adds to their SOC alongside the ARM core.
hell, powervr ones supplied graphics chips for desktop pc's, back when 3dfx (remember those?) where king... thats the thing here, ARM do not make hardware, they only makes designs and specs. Iirc, the qualcomm snapdragon is cortex compatible on the binary level, but uses a qualcomm designed core, while samsung and TI, for example, uses ARM designed cores in their products. |
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
Quote:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10123149-64.html Qualcomm is able to achieve this relatively high speed (1.5GHz) for a low-power processor because it did more than simply get a license from ARM. "We went and got an architecture license from ARM. The architecture license was for their new instruction set, the V7 instruction set. There's a difference between getting an architecture license and just getting a core license. A core license means ARM does the (chip) core and they give it to you. The architecture license is different: the actual implementation is your own. "About four years ago we had a bunch of guys join (who) used to work for IBM in the PowerPC group," Gill said. He said the engineers came from IBM's chip group that designs chips for low-power "embedded" devices. "There was a need to go do something beyond this. So, we went and got the architecture license (from ARM) and we have this team of about 50 CPU designers and we put them to task. So, four years and $350 (million) to $400 million later, we have a CPU that actually works better than the (typical) ARM CPU." |
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
Quote:
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
also, when it comes to gpu's on X86, there is intel, amd/ati and nvidia, all of whom have had to deal with open source for much longer then arm/powervr (iirc), and nvidia still insisit on making closed source drivers rather then opening up info like amd and intel have done (or i think intel have done, as they seems to employ a fair bit of open source developers).
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
Quote:
Now, I don't say Silverlight is widely used (nor do I say I love MS or want to see Silverlight replacing Flash), but the examples I gave are useful. Back with EC2008 football the alternative was DVB-H, cable or DVB-T (not portable), Windows (e.g. laptop), or simply not watching it. For a mobile device only DVB-H is a reasonable option. These devices were sold during EC2008, but DVB-H has not a commodity. It is much more rare than say a camera on a phone. If Microsoft wants Silverlight to replace Flash they will do their best to port Silverlight to ARM, including Android and Linux, simply because these devices have marketshare. They also care to optimize the performance on par with competing technologies. Quote:
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
in response to me saying I don't like all of the Linux distros, only want a super distro
Quote:
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
Quote:
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
I had to pull out my professional hat and attitude to try to quell some of the discord around here. It worked on our Symbian forums... Glad you like it. I have dredlocks now, so some might not recognize that 2008 photo.
|
Re: Intel announces Moblin 2.1 for phones
LG Gw990 Intel Moorestown smartphone , watch the video just great at 5.00 minutes and the os is Moblin 2.1 Linux based and a screen resolution 1024X480 ;).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPKTf...ayer_embedded# |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:33. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8