![]() |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
The only reason I have ever changed a cellphone (since I bought my first one in 1997 or so) is because the battery failed. I have bought replacement batteries several times, they have all without exception been as bad as the original one, and thus forced me to get a new phone instead.
I believe this is what the phone makers want, and that's the main reason for them to constantly changing the battery form factor: They're never producing new batteries, so anything you can buy for your phone is as old as the phone itself, thus, being Li-Ion or Li-Poly batteries, the shelf life and the non-optimal storage (some hot shop wall for years) makes sure that replacement batteries are useless. (And expensive. Did I mention expensive?) Despite this, I have still managed to hold on to a phone for some three years or more. If it wasn't for the battery issue my current phone would still have been an old, but small, easy, nice, semi-water-proof Nokia phone. Instead I was forced to get a new one, so I bought a S-E one from work. |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
My 5110 lasted 6 years and even after that had a week worth of idle time. Of course back then it was still using NiMH. But a replacament Li-Ion nokia original my mom bought worked without a problem. The cheap knock-off lasted ~6 months :)
|
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
My next phone change will likely be forced by the shutdown of the network upon which my current phone runs. |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
|
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
The eighteen hour max standby time seems constant across networks though. I've had it with a Nokia analogue phone on I enjoy living in the country and working in a converted coal bunker, but mobile phones don't. To keep somewhat on topic: I don't change phones often. The Nokia analogue was actually my wife's phone. The LG on Verizon was my own first mobile phone in 2001. ($250 on a 1 year contract!) I then stopped carrying a phone for several years before getting my second (and current) phone. I am considering jumping back to Verizon (prepaid this time) for better tethering. |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
geneven: studies have indeed shown that, and the fact that therefore the average cellphone minute costs users about 30cents. |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
It definitely isn't a joke :-) (And much much better than the 30$ my monopolistic telco charges for copper!) As for TV, well everything is there to make it work, ever tried Democracy Player or some such? |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
I'll go with Jay's observation, although I am also an exception. I hang onto stuff.
Manufacturers want you to replace your phone up to twice a year. Cell service providers are good with that, as new phones require less servicing and drive constantly renewed interest. So there you have it in a nutshell. |
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
I've still got the the same cell phone that I got for free back in 2004. Before that, I had that phone since 1999. :P In my WHOLE lifetime, I've only ever had three cell phones. :P
|
Re: One likely reason why our cell rates will never improve.
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:32. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8