![]() |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Quote:
|
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Quote:
the physical size of aperture is straightly relative to amount of blur. and lets take "normal" 50mm. what aperture is similar to the n900's camera module: 50/x = Ø1,8mm -> x = 28. so go ahead and try with dslr @50mm aperture about 1/28 and see how cool the blur effect is.... :eek: http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html absolutely no to the raws and stuff. theres no use for it. buy dslr if you want it. M, Av & Tv (from canon) at maximum. |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
I think more manual control over the camera would be nice.
I don't want RAW, but I want to be able to select HQ (low/no compression) or Normal JPG. And flash control. There seems to be only two settings for flash -- "glaring white-out" or "off". There's gotta be some other settings, no? The camera has "Tessar 2.8/5.2" on it, what does that all mean? EDIT: f2.8 at 5.2mm? |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
The camera also has a "rolling shutter", causing some very interesting effects to occur:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2598/...7b8493be_m.jpg |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Quote:
I also agree with the RAW capture, seems useless on a 5mp camera phone. Still if you can control the curves and levels when writing it to JPEG it could be very useful. Quote:
And yes f2.8 at 5.2mm is what ossipena was saying. Also thanks for the very cool picture, I was unaware of the rolling shutter effect and had to wiki it:o, very cool for a couple artistic ideas.:D |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Well, you can get RAW files with point and shoot digital compact cameras if you have one of Canon stylish little Ixus cameras. I can on mine, by using alternative firmware:
http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
I am aware of that. As said I haven't found an acceptable device yet. I'm not a Canikon user. But having RAW and RAW+JPEG with the N900(for those that want it - not always etc...) is imho a very good thing. It means one can go and fixup some of the more annoying issues one can get.
I know it's not the best thing with the lens and so on. But it could work well. And to the person that is completly opposed to this. I take it you're completly opposed to everything that doesn't fit your personal opinion. |
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
A small technical tidbit - on low(er)-end cameras you don't have RAW because people don't need it, but because it would be an engineering obstacle. Remember, processing an X megapixel image on a generic CPU takes a LOT of time, that's why they all use dedicated hardware for that. So, in order to fit stuff into buffers, get better image rate (=throughput) the RAW image never really reaches the firmware/'main' CPU parts. DSLRs and high-end PS-es of course go the extra mile and actually have strong enough hardware to deal with RAW through the whole image processing chain, but that's a different story. As for the particular hardware in the N900, I have no idea just how close to actual pixels can we (end users/independent developers) get - especially considering some of the elements involved in image processing (both HW&SW) are a patent/closed source minefield.
|
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Quote:
|
Re: SLR style control over N900 camera
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8