![]() |
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
i don't know why but the x3 reminds me of a waterballoon somehow ..
|
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsso...ia_x3-2964.php
in here it says secondary camera - yes (it means front right?) but where is it? i cant see it in the pics and for browser html what are the chances to get flash? beside these 1Ghz speed, 8 mp camera and 32gb internal storage (i am not sure about that also SE dont put that much internal storage) seems very interesting. P.S can someone comfirm this info on the site? it seems a little fake to me =D |
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
Quote:
|
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
Quote:
edit: by the way which one is better (n900 and x3) or (n810 and x3) or (n900/n810 with iphone) |
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
well i think we have to wait for 3 november ..
|
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
How are the cameras generally on SE phones?
}:^/~ |
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
Quote:
|
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
Quote:
|
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
I found some shots with the xperia X1. Great composition, though the photo quality is so-so.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/xperia/ Not bad overall. For comparison, the lit shots certainly seem noisier, than those on the N900. I'm curious to see how the X3 shots turn out! }:^)~ |
Re: N900 vs SE Rachel (Xperia x3)
Quote:
US forum members, please don't take me wrong, but I think that US do a big deal of noise about Nokia doing poorly in US, not have a "IPhone killer", not selling that much smartphones... but it's just in US, and the world is much bigger than that. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:57. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8