maemo.org - Talk - Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Page 29 of 40

« First

< Prev

Next >

Last »

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)

- - Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=35136)

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 13:40

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by nightfire (Post 490858)

Hey everyone,

This is what I got from the log:

Jan 23 14:25:10 glamb-n900 activesync[1804]: MS-ASProtocolVersion: 2.5

2.5 means Exchange 2003, basically.

Quote:

Jan 23 14:25:10 glamb-n900 activesync[1804]: AS-LIB: FolderSync response received (403)

Yep. Looks like infamous provisioning problem: http://wiki.maemo.org/Mail_For_Excha...Q#Provisioning

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 13:47

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrubytCIO (Post 493861)

More info... If I look at the details I do see that 244 items have been added to the calendar, however the status continues to say synchronizing and never stops. If I stop the process the changes are lost and the items never get to the calendar. I am not sure what is hanging up the process.

https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 ?

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 13:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by nightfire (Post 494259)

If any of the Nokia guys are still monitoring this thread, can anyone tell me if there's still work being done to address 2003 connectivity issues?

Exchange 2003 support is introduced in PR1.1 upgrade. Yes, ongoing bug-fixing activity is happening all the time. Regarding to all the supported servers (MS Exchange 2003 and MS Exchange 2007).

Quote:

If so, is there any way I can help?

As usually, via bug filing or e-mail client fixing (which is open-sourced).

Quote:

Also, is the source available for the exchange / activesync stuff, or is it proprietary? I could probably fix it. :)

MfE is proprietary. Modest (e-mail client) is open-sourced. So, if the bugs or wrong/stupid behavior is caused not by MfE but by modest, you could help by fixing it :-)

Quote:

Originally Posted by qhorse (Post 495175)

I tells me that the Host Address is invalid on the exchange server (translation from french);

Hmm. If it tells you this, it means that it can not resolve the host address which you enter in the server name field. Try it with the browser.

Does it contain only server name or the path as well?

E.g.:

server. com - only server name
server.com/path - server name + path.

Quote:

Originally Posted by nathanielsametz (Post 496368)

Ugh, so. 102 pages of thread and we don't have a work-around for the google incompatibilities? bummer.

I can only repeat that the N900 MfE was not designed to be compatible with google. As well as google EAS implementation was not (most probably) designed to be compatible with N900. And I don't have any fact in my pocket which give me a hope that google wants to bring this compatibility on board. At least, I have never been contacted by any google server guy. So, what do you expect from Nokia engineers? To try to catch the black cat in the black room?

If server does not want to be compatible with the client, what client could do?

Quote:

Originally Posted by IlkkaP (Post 496385)

If Apple iPhone can support provisioning, I don't see a reason why N900 could not offer it.

Me too. What I wanted to say is that MfE team is not the team which shall be blamed for absence of provisioning support. Just to be clear - this is not MfE issue. This is device-wide issue.

Guber99

2010-02-08 14:17

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516258)

Nokia N900: A $600 paper weight

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 14:21

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by hypoxic (Post 498830)

vitaly_repin, can you please clarify the following line

it is hardly advised to update to PR1.1.

Does this mean it is recommended, or is not recommended, to upgrade to PR1.1?

hardly advised === recommended. At least to my limited knowledge of the english language :)

Anything wrong with this?

Freemantle

2010-02-08 14:21

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

......or a small $600 digital photo frame.

Rob1n

2010-02-08 14:22

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516270)

hardly advised === recommended. At least to my limited knowledge of the english language :)

Anything wrong with this?

It's not normal usage, no - "strongly advised" would be better (hardly is more often used in this sense to mean "not really").

Freemantle

2010-02-08 14:22

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

hardly advised, probably means it's not advised. Otherwise it would be strongly or heavily advised.

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 14:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by 0xDEADBEEF (Post 503738)

Vitaly, (or anyone) could you please tell us if MfE supports authentication with client certificate?

:mad: It is really hard to hide anything from the community here :)

Sad news first: Current MfE available for the public does not work with client certificates. At all.

Better news: we are working on this right now. This is important bug to fix as this is 100% legal use case.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freemantle (Post 516276)

hardly advised, probably means it's not advised. Otherwise it would be strongly or heavily advised.

OK. Thanks for the clarification. Wanted to tell "strongly recommended" and told "not recommended". Funny.

Quote:

Originally Posted by planetf1 (Post 508707)

Is there a way to specify the servlet URL in mfe

* I can't see any reference in GUI
* I tried adding URL after server name, don't think that's working

So is there a text file or similar created by MFE that can be manually edited?

Not as of now, sorry.

sjgadsby

2010-02-08 14:50

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516270)

hardly advised === recommended. At least to my limited knowledge of the english language

I think you might have confused "hardly advised" with "heartily advised". They're effectively opposites, but they sound almost the same, so it's an easy mistake to make. Your English is excellent.

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 14:55

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by nokiabuff (Post 509210)

It is amazing that Nokia MFE expert does not know about server provisioning. Even in the Nokia corp I am sure their IT dept would want to have server provisioning of the phones.

1. I know about server provisioning. What forced you to think opposite?
2. A lot of Nokians use N900 without any problems. And IT department was not forced to change their policy to satisfy N900.

Regarding provisioning in general - it looks like a difference in corporate cultures in Europe and USA. European corporations tend to allow non-provisionable devices. American tend to disallow.

SubCore

2010-02-08 14:57

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 516307)

I think you might have confused "hardly advised" with "heartily advised". They're effectively opposites, but they sound almost the same, so it's an easy mistake to make.

in addition to that, "hardly advised" would be the direct translation for a number of languages. it's a common mistake amongst germans, f.ex.

btw, i already took the liberty of changing that word in the MfE Wiki site :)

vitaly_repin

2010-02-08 15:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by eitvedt (Post 513502)

My only question is: When will provisioning be implemented? My N900 will have to stay in the box until then.

As usually, I have to say that I am not Maemo marketing guy and can not communicate the plans for the future.

But what I can say is that I am in a long "fight" with platform enablers providers for several months :) They dislike me already :) I will become guber99 of Maemo if I continue this way :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by oliverm (Post 511882)

Hi chaps,

We tried to set it up again straight away but now cant get past the server information. It says

"Exchange server is not responding verify account settings are correct".

This message means that the connection to the server can not be established in a reasonable amount of time (90 secs).

It can be caused by several reasons:
1) The server is really not accessible from the network you use. E.g., the port is filtered by the firewall. You can try to check is this a reality using the command line (xterm) and telnet utility.
2) The connection can be established but the server does not respond to the specific query in 90 secs.

Most probably your case is the second if you are able to start initial sync. In this case you can try to disable syncing of calendar and contacts and check how initial sync proceeds. And enable it later from the configuration application.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kaz911 (Post 513966)

Is it not really time to wrap up this thread - and create a new thread with a summary. With 1100+ posts - this thread is now a nightmare to read through and a lot of posts relates to PR1.0.

It would be nice with a PR1.1 thread - and when PR1.2 or whatever comes out - do a summary and create a new thread.

just my two cents....

I am trying to keep wiki updated: http://wiki.maemo.org/Mail_For_Excha...rtbeat_and_FAQ

Regarding the new thread - I agree with you. I suggest to switch to a new thread when new MfE release will be publicly available.

Guber99

2010-02-08 16:17

Re: MfE woes on N900 and Exch2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516344)

Hahahhahahaah..............good one Vitaly. I have to admit that you are a hard working guy and I like you. Unlike Nokia Apologizers such as TexRat, you are factual with your comments.

Regarding the corporate culture, you are right. Americans are obsessed with their security and being able to control things (control freaks). That is the culture, and that is why I prefer Nokia Way. However, I need to respond hourly on my phone, and without being to sync with my server...................this wonderful device is of no use. And I will guberize until provisioning enabled!

tomster

2010-02-08 16:48

Re: MfE woes on N900 and Exch2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516344)

I will become guber99 of Maemo if I continue this way :D

Haha, that made my day!

Back to topic.

I get somewhat confused when trying to depict whether a feature request is MfE-related or not. After having it given some thought I come to the conclusion that this most eventually origins from where in maemo I make the desired settings. When setting up a MfE-account on the E71 I can define settings which are definitely not related to MfE-functionality per se. But the options are integrated in the GUI-wizard.

As example I would bring up whether to sync or not when on a GSM/ UMTS roaming connection (or similar with folder-subsciptions). All entries/ settings are set on the MfE-wizard though they are not directly MfE-related function-wise. But sure are GUI-wise.

As end-user you probably couldn't care less if the feature you just enabled by check-box is "powered" by MfE or some other tiny daemon hidden somewhere in the vaults of the maemo OS. But having those settings all in one place is what I'd call (end)user-friendly ;-)

What would I want to say?

I can't help thinking that there should be included as much setting options as possible in the MfE-wizard (or MfE settings tab) - even if they're not directly linked to MfE's original purpose - plain sync.
But the GUI - at least for me - is part of the MfE project too.

I know this sounds somehow ignorant to the devs' work behind the scenes, but having a nicely working/ feature-rich GUI is what probably 90% of us N900 users judge your progress on - especially since we can't check out SVN on changes ;-)

SkyEagle

2010-02-08 20:12

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 516237)

https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 ?

Hi Vitaly !

Welcome back !

Sorry to bother you...but if you could look at this issue...you'll make me happy and I could start using N900. Now it is alone in the desk :-( .
I don't know if the problem is due to the VERY POOR Calendar or to a problem in MFE protocol with 2003 server.
I cannot use calendar and task sync... it crashed the MFE sysnc process...Probably for the presence of recurring events..someone has showed a workaround to this issue but I don't have the time to cancel every recurring event in Outlook Exchange...so please...fix this as soon as possible.

Another thing: do you know someone responsible for Calendar/Modest coding in Maemo team?
We need to have those apps upgraded in several ways to improve usability and basic missing features.
Where we have to ask ?

Thanks,
Cesare

CrashandDie

2010-02-08 23:17

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Hi,

I would suggest that those who believe in this thread moderate it themselves. Don't feed the troll and don't allow them to gain more momentum than required (none at all).

I will not hesitate to close this thread if it becomes a troll cave.

Guber99, you've been warned.

Guber99

2010-02-09 00:05

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrashandDie (Post 516958)

WTF is wrong with you? Warned of what? Posting my inability to connect?

jacktanner

2010-02-09 06:04

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Now that Symbian is open sourced, is there anything to be gained from its MfE?

vitaly_repin

2010-02-09 07:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacktanner (Post 517239)

Now that Symbian is open sourced, is there anything to be gained from its MfE?

Is Symbian MfE open-sourced?

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkyEagle (Post 516710)

I cannot use calendar and task sync... it crashed the MFE sysnc process...Probably for the presence of recurring events..someone has showed a workaround to this issue but I don't have the time to cancel every recurring event in Outlook Exchange...so please...fix this as soon as possible.

Crashed or freezed? In other words, is it the issue described here: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 or different issue?

Quote:

Another thing: do you know someone responsible for Calendar/Modest coding in Maemo team?
We need to have those apps upgraded in several ways to improve usability and basic missing features.
Where we have to ask ?

There are 2 ways to influence the responsible Maemo components:

1) File the bugs against corresponding components in maemo bugzilla
2) Contribute to the open-sourced code.

Modest is fully open-sourced. And calendar backend is open-sourced as far as I remember.

Hussam

2010-02-09 08:56

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

2- It doesn't support Arabic some time , so some messages comes with question marks instead of Arabic characters .
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/...024c3b41_o.png

I noticed that all my Arabic emails received from Hotmail, Gmail, or even my Kerio all with Question marks the only emails that appear in correct Arabic characters are from Yahoo :confused:.
any clue?

Fredrik75

2010-02-09 11:03

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Hi!

Don't know if this has been asked before but I couldn't find anything about it. We're running Exchange 2007.

- Move message to another exchange folder - supported? I dont have the option like in the imap-accounts.

- Cut and paste? Loosing my mind on this one...

/Fredrik

jacktanner

2010-02-09 18:00

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 517307)

Is Symbian MfE open-sourced?

I've no idea. Grepping for "activesync" does return a few hits.

http://developer.symbian.org/xref/ep...project=%2FFCL

SkyEagle

2010-02-09 18:24

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by vitaly_repin (Post 517307)

Is Symbian MfE open-sourced?

Crashed or freezed? In other words, is it the issue described here: https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7971 or different issue?

There are 2 ways to influence the responsible Maemo components:

1) File the bugs against corresponding components in maemo bugzilla
2) Contribute to the open-sourced code.

Modest is fully open-sourced. And calendar backend is open-sourced as far as I remember.

Hi Vitaly !

Well...I think it is the same issue of that bug but I couldn't attach logs etc...really not having the time to breath :( in this period.
..so I voted the bug already.
I have many recurring events (most of them are birthdays but I can't manually delete all of them in outlook since I should do this one by one). All I can say is that I'm using Exchange 2003 SP2, the last firmware PR 1.1 and that I can successfully sync email and contacts but It freeze the sync process when I try to sync calendar and task.
I suggest anyway to separate the flag in MFE for the calendar and task in order to have more granularity and isolate potential problmes in one of them.

It would be nice also to sync the Notes.

Regarding the contributing to Modest/Calendar I'm really sorry but I can't do any coding :mad: (I'm not a programmer) and I'm not sure that file a bug for a missing feature or a improvment is a correct use of bugzilla.
..I saw also Brainstorm section and I voted for many of the beautiful ideas expressed over there but the problem is: who will implement them ?

It is really strange that with all the programmer Gurus here nobody is working to improve Calemdar and Modest programs in order to gain a decent PIM functionality.

Cesare

rvdkrogt

2010-02-09 23:42

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Just another coin in the box. I stoped using the N900 some weeks ago as also my company requires provisioning support on their exchange 2007 environment. I had to go back to my old phone.

Really a pitty, but without sync'in mail and calendar it is not an option for me to use it.

So I play some Jewel on it once-in-a-while and that is it....:-(

Sad...sad...sad...

Regards,
Rob

rmarcus

2010-02-09 23:44

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

I have it working now!! :D

Guber99

2010-02-10 01:11

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by rvdkrogt (Post 518561)

same issue here Rob. i can not fathom Nokia strategy not to make provisioning as professional and business types have the money to buy this pricy device. i went back to iphone 3GS.........the email on 3GS is flawless with search function etc......

rmarcus

2010-02-10 11:37

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guber99 (Post 518661)

I don't know exactly if we are talking about the same thing...but my gmail works as a charm both ways, MfE and through the email accounts.
And now also the google calendar is working again.

:o

wolfpac72

2010-02-10 15:32

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guber99 (Post 518661)

Hello im just wondering about the provisioning.
In fact it really seems to be a US issue, talked to several IT Guys here in big European based companies, and nobody is using provisioning.
They even told me that this is not a security issue but its just like it has been all the years and it stays like this :)
About the certificates, I tried using it with my M4EX Server in P12 Format which I use on my NOKIA E71 and also the Blackberry Storm i use lately for testing.
Sometimes works like charm sometimes not. But I think if the Certificate is in proper P12 Format it can work just not stable enough.
Never mind I do really not think that somebody buys the Device just for the Mail for Exchange usage, due for that its just too big, so its absolutely pointless that some people call it a brick for 600 $, not mentioning names due they are not able to use M4EX with N900 :D

BR

Wolfpac

ukdude

2010-02-10 15:48

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Hi Tomster,

Have you used mfefolders. I am finding the app takes about 30 seconds to open and then closes after 30 seconds before i finish any settings.

Any advise out there is much appreciated.

Eug

davidh101

2010-02-10 16:46

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

1 Attachment(s)

Hi,

I have a problem Saying that: Error in communication with Exchange Server

This happens everytime I n900 syncs with exchange.

I had a thread here, but figured this might be a better place.

A quick summary of the other thread:

I am running Exchange 2003 with a Self-Signed Certificate, this is all working correctly, the instructions to get this working were simple and easy to follow.

Syncing happened fine for a while, using a mixture of Always On, Manual etc

Now, I get the above message evertime it syncs, I have tried syncing just one item type at a time, contact, and calendar both sync with no problem, so the issue is something to do with e-mails

One thing I did do before I noticed this error was to enable my skype account, and merge the contacts......however, now I am not sure that is so relevant.

I have attached a log for anyone to look at (obviously replacing IMEI, username, domain etc)

It appears to have an error of 1004, but I am not completely sure of what is going on in the log, so I may be wrong.

Saturn

2010-02-10 23:00

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidh101 (Post 519711)

I am running Exchange 2003 with a Self-Signed Certificate, this is all working correctly, the instructions to get this working were simple and easy to follow.

Syncing happened fine for a while, using a mixture of Always On, Manual etc

Now, I get the above message evertime it syncs, I have tried syncing just one item type at a time, contact, and calendar both sync with no problem, so the issue is something to do with e-mails

Might be useful, I had a similar problem and one day mails didn't want to sync anymore. If I just set to sync contacts and calendar only all would complete fine.
I found out that the problem was the "Deleted Items" folder I had and everything went back to normal after disabling it with M4Efolders app.

EDIT: checking my logs I got also error 1004 as you mention:

Code:

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: BasicSyncActionWrapper: execute failed with err=1004, failsCount=2

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: ActionWarpper - action completed with result 1004

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: SyncScheduler::onSyncCompleted aStatus=1004, mForcedSchedule=-2

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: StoreProxyImpl::freeSpaceAvailable avail=442118, blocks=516052, aSize=0, bsize=4096, result=1

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: UiNotifier::showInfoBanner aId=5

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: UiNotifier::showInfoBanner aText=Error in communication with Exchange server.

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: QString StoreProxyImpl::getUpdatedItems()

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: currentUploaded=''

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: ASDAEMON-SYNC: Sync mail complete: Camel ActiveSync provider is notified

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: AsStatusManager::handleSyncCompleted(1, 1004)

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 activesync[1363]: AsStatusManager::handleSyncFailed(1, 0, 5)

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 [1517]: activesync: AS-MODEST: HandleOperationCompleted() aOperation [1], aArguments = [(nil)], aStatus = [1004]

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 [1517]: activesync: protocolwrapper.cpp Line 537, void HandleOperationCompleted(void*, AsDBusOperation, void*, int, const char*, const GPtrArray*): Thread 0x84820 AS CAMEL: D-Bus EVENT RECEIVED. Operation[1] Error[1004]

Jan 30 01:23:31 Nokia-N900-42-11 [1517]: activesync: protocolwrapper.cpp Line 282, void acquireSemaphore(): Thread 0x84820 AS CAMEL: storageSemaphore: Acquire semaphore

BTW, does anyone has an explanation why there are twice the Drafts and Sent Items folders?

Saturn

2010-02-10 23:04

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukdude (Post 519599)

Just realised I've replied to your other comment on this here

SubCore

2010-02-10 23:06

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saturn (Post 520334)

BTW, does anyone has an explanation why there are twice the Drafts and Sent Items folders?

one pair is local, the other on the server.

the mail client currently doesn't save sent items on the server (this applies to IMAP accounts as well).

Saturn

2010-02-10 23:18

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubCore (Post 520340)

one pair is local, the other on the server.

the mail client currently doesn't save sent items on the server (this applies to IMAP accounts as well).

Thanks, I've suspected something like that. It does the same also for the Drafts and if you start a mail in Outlook it is not possible to continue where you left on Modest. It's quite annoying.

davidh101

2010-02-10 23:19

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saturn (Post 520334)

BTW, does anyone has an explanation why there are twice the Drafts and Sent Items folders?

I think this is because there is a phone (local) Drafts, Sent and Outbox which is common to all messaging items, thn second set appear as 'web' folders as they are the ones held on the exchange server

I might be wrong, but that's my guess

davidh101

2010-02-10 23:51

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saturn (Post 520334)

Tried mfefolders, and it now all works fine.....not sure if it was the deleted items folder as I have disabled a couople of others too, but i suspect it was

Guber99

2010-02-10 23:57

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by wolfpac72 (Post 519578)

Would you carry around a device that you can not access your email?

msorsaleslie

2010-02-11 07:57

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

I might be a complete dumbo, but I just found out why my Google Apps Premier account was not sync'ing and giving me the "Exchange Account Disabled. Access Refused" message...it was because I had not gone into the Google Mobile service settings and enabled Google Sync. Doh!

See the instructions here

http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/...&answer=138651

Just started the MfE sync process and connected correctly. Lets see if the whole process completes properly...I will report back

mrmoosehead

2010-02-11 08:05

Re: Mail for Exchange (MfE). Blame me here, pls

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guber99 (Post 520396)

Would you carry around a device that you can not access your email?

I dream of not being able to access my email all the time. Think of all the crises that I wouldn't know about all the time. Bliss.

All times are GMT. The time now is 23:07.

Page 29 of 40

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8