maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Brainstorm (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=37261)

kryptoniankid17 2009-12-21 20:46

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sjgadsby (Post 436599)
Talk profiles have fields for AIM, ICQ, MSN, Skype, and Y!M. maemo.org profiles have fields for AIM, Jabber, and MSN as well as IRC.

Didnt mean to say the last part. What i meant was one standerd im proticol for the site .

Texrat 2009-12-22 17:49

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
New solution added: Solution #8: Add filtering options based on other metadata not mentioned in Solution1

Please review and vote!

http://maemo.org/community/brainstor...d_in_solution1

Texrat 2009-12-22 18:01

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kryptoniankid17 (Post 436762)
Didnt mean to say the last part. What i meant was one standerd im proticol for the site .

I don't agree with imposing a single standard, but I would like to see a default selected, as well as preferred client listed.

GeraldKo 2009-12-22 18:31

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Texrat's Solution #8 sounds fine to me, if that's how people want an additional filter to work, but ...

I'm disturbed that in 35 minutes (or less), Solution #8 has acquired as many Thumbs-Ups as Solution #1 has acquired after a week.* Until I'm corrected, I infer that there are plenty of very unsympathetic N900 users following this Brainstorm. I'm surprised and disappointed that none of them found it worth voting for Solution #1 as a fair and painless way for them to help maintain the utility of this forum for N810/N800/770 users. Had I been an N900-using forum member, I'd have voted for Solution #1 to help them. (Heck, I'd have voted for it to eliminate other categories I didn't want also; but even besides that, I'd have done it out of goodwill.)


*And none of the other Solutions #2 through #7 had more than #1, either.

Texrat 2009-12-22 18:32

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Gerald, I'm pretty sure Solution #8 got so many votes so quickly due to product placement-- I embedded a link into today's molotov cocktail thread. ;)

It's all about advertising... :D

GeraldKo 2009-12-22 18:40

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 437861)
Gerald, I'm pretty sure Solution #8 got so many votes so quickly due to product placement-- I embedded a link into today's molotov cocktail thread. ;)

It's all about advertising... :D

Then please do me a favor and advertise to them to support specifically Solution #1 also in order to give us N8x0 users a break!

Texrat 2009-12-22 18:44

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Gerald... what stops you from stumping for your solution? Feel free to spread the word! Put it in your signature! Spam it from the rooftops! ;)

Texrat 2009-12-22 18:57

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Just an FYI regarding technicalities of proposals...

I for one would prefer we avoid a lot of customization, mainly for Reggie's sake as well as ease of maintenance. Future vBulletin upgrades risk breaking custom solutions.

If functionality we request is not avalaible out of the box with vBulletin, but needs to be implemented using it, then IMO it makes better sense to push proposals to that development team.

OrangeBox 2009-12-22 19:04

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
When OrangeBox posts direct it to /dev/null

GeraldKo 2009-12-22 19:26

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 437885)
Gerald... what stops you from stumping for your solution? Feel free to spread the word! Put it in your signature! Spam it from the rooftops! ;)

Only on this thread, until this post, have I not been using my signature. :)

(OTOH, I'm not getting on lots of "molotov cocktail" threads because I don't really want to add to them; and I'm not getting on useful N900 threads since I don't have much to add; and so all my stumping is to the little remnant that's left of N8x0/770 users, and we're shrinking/dying breed!)

(You're old enough, I think, Texrat, to enjoy the link I have for "Help Save This Forum ... " :) )


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:22.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8