maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Brainstorm (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010 (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=37261)

GeraldKo 2009-12-22 20:17

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
I think your categorization layout is one solution. To me the others are independent. We learn more about what people want from voting on them independently. Also, let's say I liked one of your ideas and not another -- if they were combined, how would I vote?

GeraldKo 2009-12-22 20:19

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Also, I'd like Roger to be able to look at the various solutions and say, "Yeah, I can easily do A and L but the others, hmm, I don't know," and then just go do A and L, so long as A and L aren't inherently dependent on the others.

fatalsaint 2009-12-22 23:22

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Well I made the solutions. Feel free to vote for them up or down... I would like feedback if you vote down, though. But that's merely a request.

fatalsaint 2009-12-23 01:43

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
I just have to say.. it does not surprise me to see all three of my new solutions "Thumbed Down".. and yet, no more posts in here ;).

wesgreen 2009-12-23 02:14

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
just bumping up the link for voting:
http://maemo.org/community/brainstor...sign_for_2010/

GeraldKo 2009-12-23 05:37

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Yup, my two each have one Thumbs-Down now, also; and I, too, would really like to know why. Frankly, I can't imagine why anybody would vote down Solution #1. For Solution #3, it's at least comprehensible to me that someone might prefer a different solution and therefor stick it to that one. But Solution #1? I can't see any reason anyone would vote it down except out of a sort of spite akin to the spirit of vandalism.

So whoever you are, I, too, would like to hear from you as to why.

Texrat 2009-12-23 05:46

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
I really, really hope it isn't spite. But yeah, in all seriousness, I wish people would explain their votes either way.

fatalsaint 2009-12-23 05:51

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Well, my two solutions to help alleviate this type of thing - haven't been very well received. They quickly received the same "1 down" vote.

Oh well.. life goes on. I ignore votes from people who are, evidently, ashamed of their vote.

Whats next Tex? Do we just let the brainstorm sit there for all eternity? Is there a magical number of "plus" votes we need to achieve? Whats kind of.. "the process".. type of thing.

RevdKathy 2009-12-23 08:05

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
I've refrained from voting, and tried to stay out of this thread, because as a n900b I'm part of the problem. But I do desperately want a solution. T.m.o. has to be big enough for all of us. Please, please find the solution that will suit the tablet-users best, and implement it.

slartibart 2009-12-23 08:38

Re: [Under consideration] Proposed Talk forum improvements for 2010
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RevdKathy (Post 438712)
I've refrained from voting, and tried to stay out of this thread, because as a n900b I'm part of the problem. But I do desperately want a solution. T.m.o. has to be big enough for all of us. Please, please find the solution that will suit the tablet-users best, and implement it.

...and the point of that post was....?

Just curious.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:22.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8