![]() |
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Quote:
It's partly the processor bump and partly Flash improvements. For whatever it's worth, Diablo's Flash seems a little bit better than Chinook's. |
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Wow I cannot believe I just did that. I've been working with computers since I was like ten. Running on five hours of sleep is definitely not good for me :P
hmmm I kinda wanna upgrade to Diablo but every time I approach it I decide to wait for the official release |
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Quote:
|
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Quote:
|
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Quote:
|
Re: Very disappointed in N800 video capabilities
Quote:
By the way, I can convert DVD resolution widescreen movies to play beautifully (people usually gasp and stare transfixed) on the N800. The N800's screen is really a joy to behold. The secret is using all of the screen's real-estate. You have to resize the video to 240 pixels vertically, and then crop horizontally to 400 pixels. Yes, this involves cropping some video from the sides, but the results are far more impressive than leaving it letterboxed. I found bitrate is very important, too. I found that a high-action TV episode plays beautifully at 550 kbps, but at 650 it stutters at the exciting bits. Transcode some cool high-action video to 2-pass XviD 400x240 at 550 kbps, and then show it to your friends. Lots of "ooohs" and "ahhhs" will follow. EDIT: I also recommend breaking up long movies into 30-minute or 1 hour chunks. Searching is a real pain if you lose your spot in a 2 hour movie. EDIT2: I just checked my copy of Ratatouille, and it plays back very nicely at ~700 kbps. So YMMV. Maybe there's some interaction with the audio encoding, which can vary dramatically from video to video. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:14. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8