Re: Returning my N900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargus
(Post 527971)
If you wish to rant please find a posting that at least has the same tone to start with.
|
As a matter of fact, I do not wish to rant. And you're ranting every bit as much as me. It is the blatant black/white lack of understanding here that is my issue. I for one are not returning my N900 because I think it's a quite good device, but it has a long number of issues. Some which are harder than others to predict before you learn about it.
The ranting in this thread and similar threads, and I've seen some huge fonts, are from some that seem to feel personally insulted if a persons pre-sales research didn't include printboard schematics. You can only research so much before you either have to buy it or not. I have spent a lot of time reading about this phone before I got it in mid December. And I think the people saying "you got what you deserve for not doing research" are plain rude.
I tend to take side against rude people, and answer in their own language. It's a flaw, I know.
I can see that your information collection moved from Wikipedia to the European News broadcasting. Either way, before I got this phone I had no idea what AT commands were, and that the car stereo relied on them to transfer contacts. As a matter of fact, I don't think one in a hundred people would know. Now that I know, I feel I have wasted valuable time finding it out. Truth is, most people want to know if their stereo can "hook up to their phone", and if it can receive stereo bluetooth audio. That's as much information as most people would want to know. Having to first research A2DP, then AVRCP, then AT messages, just to find out if there is a chance that it'll work in practice too... That's not doing too little research. That's doing too much research.
|