![]() |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
Ok, this is my review based ONLY on what i see there, so I may be perfectly wrong: It looks like a complete chroot (probably even bootable?) of some sort of debian with gnome. It includes several security tools, ie: Msf3, SET, a exploits database, karmetasploit, kismet, tor (torproxy, torscanner, etc), full aircrack-ng suite, lorcon, wifizoo, traceroute, strace, wireshark, a neopwn gui, amap, netcat, ettercap, nping, hping3, p0f, etc... So yes, it is exactly what was expected to be, even if very alpha considering many other straight-to-compile tools are missing, BUT.... ... it also includes a compiler so here's where everyone can just download the sources of any tool you need and just fill the gap. <- HINT: In a previous post i give a list of tools that need NO modifications to compile, and there are MANY more. Now, if only the injection driver was CONFIRMED to consistenly work... :P |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
Quote:
http://android.modaco.com/content-pa...hero/page/340/ It also seems that injection patches for wl12xx have already been included in compat-wireless but I don't know what modifications would be needed to make it work on N900. it also seems that wl1251 in hero is using SDIO. Again, I am talking just from what I read, and perhaps I didn't get it right. Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
I assumed wl1251 never hit upstream. compat-wireless with the aircrack-ng.org patch would be the best place to start. But wl1251 still need the patch; stack and radiotap need converted/adapted patches for 2.6.28.10 unless the previous version works.
some of the kids on that board don't know what they're talking about. I see them confusing RFMON with live injection, and only briefly mentioning it. sdio is a non-sequitur on the N900. The Hero has different hardware. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
2 Attachment(s)
Well, given that we're using a driver of the same name,.with practically the same size, and the same entries in /sys/, this certainly begins to look like a derived work from here. Any chance someone could strings it?
I'll attach the results of Code:
strings /lib/modules/2.6.28-omap1/wl12xx.ko > 2.6.28-omap1_wl12xx.ko.strings.txtA bunch of stuff is just interfacing and needs to be the same, but e.g. error messages won't all be the same, unless it's copied (and I sadly have little doubt left). Quote:
If you disagree with that statement of legal fact, please explain why I'm wrong. If you agree regarding the legal situation, but feel you're ethically, morally, or otherwise justified. then I've already said I don't care to join the argument for or against you -- how hard is that to understand? |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Benson, I think he just lumped together our two posts, since I made a moral claim about implicit agreements with the maker of the work, while you you made a legal claim, and either due to lack of mental diligence or just an honest mistake, his mind mixed/confused the two.
I would have continued from his statements, but as much as I'd want to, this is not the place for an ethical debate. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Sorry to say, but from all my testing - the packaged driver does not properly inject. Unless the shipped modules that are not installed, need to be - this is a very broken beta.
EDIT: K, as stated - the modules that come prepackaged for power40-wl1 do not support injection. However, the straggling modules included with the gzip DO. TEST injection is working 100%. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
after installing the modules from neopwn, injection is working!
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
So - as I imagined. The dangling modules need to be installed - why these aren't pre-packaged, is completely beyond me.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:38. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8