maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Alternatives (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile! (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=45472)

joshv06 2010-11-11 17:16

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one1002 (Post 870532)
hmm..it seems that neopwn packet injection isn't working with latest power-kernel..user Kieron has confirmed this..

i wonder if there's any workaround to enable packet injection with the latest power-kernel?

Maybe us NeoPwn users can ask Titan to implement it to the next kernel-power version? Maybe it's possible, idk.

one1002 2010-11-11 17:24

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
however, i don't know which file is missing in the latest kernel-power that were presence in kernel-power v40...

Kieron 2010-11-11 18:02

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one1002 (Post 870542)
however, i don't know which file is missing in the latest kernel-power that were presence in kernel-power v40...

Yeah, I think the dev modded the kernel cause its got 'wl' at the end of the filename, whereas the normal powerkernel doesn't. Not sure how we'd check.

I'm sticking to the old PK for now. NeoPwn > usbhost! :D

one1002 2010-11-11 19:51

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
i guess it's a patch to allow interface of wlan0 monitor mode, but i could be wrong. i don't know..will get back to all of you if there's any news..

Megaltariak 2010-11-11 21:28

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
No, monitor mode is fully working with the normal power-kernel, and works only on channel 6 with stock kernel.
The modded kernel only provide support for injection. However, injection modules must be loaded at runtime, and unloaded for normal use of wlan.

Kieron 2010-11-11 21:41

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Didn't work for me. I tried to load modules, and my normal script didn't work.

If anyone else can confirm that PK does infact work, I'll be glad if they could help me get it working :D

Megaltariak 2010-11-11 22:42

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Injection only works with the modded power-kernel from neopwn.
Injection and monitor mode are very different things, google is your friend if you don't know what it is.

OptX 2010-11-12 09:20

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Why not giving multiboot a go, since new Version is here ?
Neopwn is still running fine for me.
Here are the steps to set up multiboot : http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=526

karniv0re 2010-11-12 17:38

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
I extracted the following files from neopwn tar.gz and moved them to to a folder "pinject" under /opt/
compat.ko
rfkill_backport.ko
cfg80211.ko
mac80211.ko
wl1251.ko
wl1251_spi.ko

I then wrote a script, named it as on-mod.sh, that contained the following:
#!bin/bash
rmmod wl12xx
rmmod mac80211
rmmod cfg80211
insmod compat.ko
insmod rfkill_backport.ko
insmod cfg80211.ko
insmod mac80211.ko
insmod wl1251.ko
insmod wl1251_spi.ko

when i run this, the wl12xx is unloaded (since i cant see any wireless networks in my select connection panel), however i get the following errors:
insmod error inserting 'compat.ko': -1 invalid module format
insmod error inserting 'rfkill_backport.ko': -1 invalid module format
insmod error inserting 'cfg80211.ko': -1 invalid module format
insmod error inserting 'mac80211.ko': -1 invalid module format
insmod error inserting 'wl1251.ko': -1 invalid module format
insmod error inserting 'wl1251_spi.ko': -1 invalid module format

What am i doing wrong?? I can work my way around linux and have done a bit of work with aircrack, but this has me stumped.

I have *NOT* used any of the other files from the neopwn tar.gz. The following files were also present in the folder:
kernel-power_2.6.28-maemo40-wl1_armel.deb
kernel-power-flasher_2.6.28-maemo40-wl1_armel.deb
kernel-power-modules_2.6.28-maemo40-wl1_armel.deb

I just need packet injection to work without the whole neopwn suite... Any help here??

one1002 2010-11-12 19:28

Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OptX (Post 871256)
Why not giving multiboot a go, since new Version is here ?
Neopwn is still running fine for me.
Here are the steps to set up multiboot : http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...&postcount=526

thx for the heads up..but i prefer not to use multiboot because it literally flashes each and everytime when booting into a kernel..

do u know how to make it work with u-boot?


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:18.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8