|
Page 10 of 20 |
|
Prev |
8 9 10
11 12
|
Next
| Last
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
If i open neopwn it crash. Any ideas?
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
:D |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
But other people can run it. I'll reinstall
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
cd /opt/neopwn/control-panel-ui/ run-standalone.sh python main.py |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
thanks in advance |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
sudo gainroot chmod +x /usr/bin/neopwn.sh chmod +x /usr/bin/neopwn and now its great no crash when u launch with the program icon ;) if u have another question ..............:) for who not having the files for installing the beta i can upload it ... just tell me ?? why wanna upload it cause it's very very very beta beta only have injection and metasploit (metasploit can run without neopwn in n900 and paying 40 $ just for the injection it's not like what im thinking about OPEN SOURCE so ......... |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
please upload it for us
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
Personally I haven't ordered the beta as it's not that important to me right now. If it was, I wouldnt mind donating. If you are serious about pen testing I don't think $40 is excessive, especially if the problem of the injection driver is solved. From what we understand it cost the developer a lot to jump that hurdle, whatever your idea of "open source" is. I think if you don't understand that and don't want to help with these costs then you shouldn't really be ordering this beta at all in the first place. Which begs the question for those with the beta, how well does the injection driver work? is it the real deal? :) |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
Could you help me pleaseee??? |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
badfusion, your offer is tempting, simply because packet injection = awesome.
But my ethics lead me to discourage you from doing it. I don't really like the developer's approach to this, but as I said in other posts, I believe in giving people the benefit of the doubt - and so far, I feel more on his side than on the side of most people who b!tched in the first ten-twenty pages of this thread about his missed initial delivery date. At any rate, I do wish he just open sourced what he's working on currently from the get-go. But now that he hasn't, you breaking an implicit promise (which you DO implicitly make when you pay for inclusion in the private beta - there may have been no legal terms to call you on it, but morally it is there) isn't that much better. By buying access to the private beta, or 'donating enough to be granted access to the private beta', however you want to word that, you are presenting yourself as someone who in good faith intends to keep the private beta private. Even if you don't accept that premise, it's still against the wishes of the person from who you're getting the program(s)+driver, and since his wishes are not too inherently unethical, I personally thing going against them by uploading the stuff puts you in the moral wrong. - EDIT - Hoggerz says he's been able to send deauth packets (as in for deauthorizing a client connected to a network). Based on what he said (I myself am not an expert) this means that at least some injection is working. Whether or not all of it is working, or not, is another matter, but if it's working at all, then it should be a matter of time before it works in every application. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/pr...i/Install_N900 |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
yes, without neopwn work fine:
metasploit, sslstrip, nmap, netcat, ettercap, wireshark, tor, aircrack(not injection) and with neopwn: ettercap, netcat, aircrack(not injection) and wireshark n900=free neopwn=40$ I don´t understand :p *sorry for my english |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
can one of you neopwn buyers execute:
aireplay-ng -9 -e essid wlan0 (where essid is a existing name of a access point in quotes) to test injection |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
Got to say I'm a little disappointed about neopwn so far as I thought there would be a lot more activity. I'm personally still waiting for my SD card to turn up, fingers crossed it'll be today, then I'll be giving it it a go. :) You guy's have to remember that it's early days still. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
finally neopwn running, but monitor mode doesnt work, i installed the 3 debs on step 8, but when trying airmon:
Interface Chipset Driver wlan0 Unknown Unknown (MONITOR MODE NOT SUPPORTED) any ideas? thanks |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
badfusion, go ahead and upload it for me.
appreciate it. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
tanx |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
I ran aireplay-ng -9 mon0 this is my output Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
I assume testap is yours? How physically close are you to the AP?
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
links to download please, please, please!!
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
However, two rights don't make a wrong, and if the patch is not explicitly released under the GPL or a compatible license, distributing the combination doesn't magically relicense the patch under the GPL, it just means that distribution of a patched driver is copyright infringement, legally exactly the same as "pirating" commercial warez. Similarly, further distribution of the patched driver is equally unlawful -- the GPL doesn't and can't grant you any right to redistribute, since it doesn't apply to the patch, so again, this is exactly the same as sharing warez. Simply put, it's not "OPEN SOURCE", so what you expected of open source is irrelevant. Now all that's not to say "don't do it", or to claim that it's necessarily morally wrong (opposed to legally wrong) to do so. I'm quite aware that some people consider copyright laws completely invalid, or at least feel no moral compunction about breaking them, and I've no interest in holy-warring for either side here. Just be aware that that's what you're discussing (and that doing so is probably a violation of these boards' .terms of service, FWIW). |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
so, whats the current status of you guys? it seems that injection (for the most of you) is _not_ working, right?
normally i would love to donate for such a project, but with all the delays, misinformations, etc. i'm more than careful. in a bad world i would like to have a copy for own researches too, but this isn't a bad world, right? |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Ho, ho, ho... citroenpartij
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
yeah, download works like a charm. ;)
p.s. it's one of the oldest troling page i know (it even says the url in the description). :) |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
one using WEP and one with WPA2 both are about 2 - 3 meters away, also tried moving about so the distances are different |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
No puedo donar, necesito el dinero para comer, estoy sin trabajo.
|
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Perhaps it is too soon, but from reading past comments it seems that:
- Nobody has reported to be able to successfully and consistently inject (which doesn't imply it is not working, as I think lxp word has a well deserved credit). - Nobody has reported a full suite of pentesting tools included. Which looks very strange to me as there's lots of tools that compile RIGHT AWAY under maemo, ie: BTcrack, bt_audit-0.1.1, kismet, amap, foremost-1.5.7, john-1.7.6, karma-0.4, icmpchat-0.7, carwhisperer, macchanger, sleuthkit-3.1.3, strace-4.5.18, socat-2.0.0-b4, wlandecrypter-0.6, weplab-0.1.5, btscanner-2.1, p0f, redfang-2.5, scalpel-1.60, SIPcrack, xprobe2-0.3, frontline, bdaddr, hydra-5.4... and many more... I was expecting NeoPwn to include all of them, among others that would require a bit more effort to port, in a well organised (BackTrack style) way. Perhaps I was expecting too much or is it that noone has really dig much into it? Would anyone be so kind as to give a more comprehensive report on what is included in the beta release so that the rest can do an informed decision before blindly donating? Thanks in advance P.S.: I will probably donate $40 just for the injection driver if it works anyways, but I hate doing anything BLINDLY... That's just me, though. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
ja ja ja ...estamos en la misma condicion.... |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
It's sad that the chap behind the project appeears to be keeping so quiet about it - not suggesting that he be expected to answer support questions, just think that he should consider engaging with this board a little more. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Quote:
It seems not to boot at all with my setting. |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
I didn't in the end and just uninstalled multiboot instead. It seemed to work okay but each time multiboot tried to flash the power40-wl1 kernel, it would go dead and not switch on anymore without immediatley switching off after a few seconds. So I had to reflash the maemo kernel with the USB cable to be able to boot. Not sure whats wrong with it
Still not having much luck with injection apart from WPA deauth and handshake capture, although once it did say 3% on injection test in GrimWEPA. Might be my wireless ap though. hoggerz hoggerz |
Re: NeoPwn v2 = BackTrack Mobile!
Testers, please post the kernel version that's being booted, to ensure the correct modules are being loaded.
uname -a |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 22:51. |
Page 10 of 20 |
|
Prev |
8 9 10
11 12
|
Next
| Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8