Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

Running Linux 2.6.28.10power27 (titan kernel) with tonish starving config @1Ghz.

Results : +68% compared to default config.

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

can someone who understands the data a little better make a simple comparison between various kernel?. i havent been keeping on the bleeding edge with new ones as 800 the mhz kernel works fine for me. im curious if the newer 800 mhz kernels are superior.Ive kinda been not too focused on that cause i wasnt gonna mess with kernels til after pr 1.2 came out, any day now lulz

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

Some benches / info from me as well, on a fresh booted system:

First off, running @1150MHz the phone reboots. Haven't dared to try higher voltages.
However, Titan XLV @1100MHz is stable, with battery temps at just below 50c:


BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 452.52 : 11.61 : 3.81
STRING SORT : 79.648 : 35.59 : 5.51
BITFIELD : 1.5413e+08 : 26.44 : 5.52
FP EMULATION : 112.75 : 54.11 : 12.48
FOURIER : 2123.7 : 2.42 : 1.36
ASSIGNMENT : 7.3066 : 27.80 : 7.21
IDEA : 1220.7 : 18.67 : 5.54
HUFFMAN : 710.62 : 19.71 : 6.29
NEURAL NET : 2.2165 : 3.56 : 1.50
LU DECOMPOSITION : 81.869 : 4.24 : 3.06
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 24.965
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 3.316
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler
10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU :
L2 Cache :
OS : Linux 2.6.28.10power34
C compiler : gcc version 4.2.1
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 6.031
INTEGER INDEX : 6.383
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.839
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3,
libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.


Running at 1000MHz with lower voltages seems to give 3 celcius lower values to battery.

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

Finally got to properly start playing with my week-old n900:
Titan's Ideal config @ 850MHz:
Titan's ideal config @ 950MHz

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

Mine is here...havent tweaked anything yet, other than installing kp and nb
stock settings 125-600

BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)

TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 245.84 : 6.30 : 2.07
STRING SORT : 43.034 : 19.23 : 2.98
BITFIELD : 8.4097e+07 : 14.43 : 3.01
FP EMULATION : 61.831 : 29.67 : 6.85
FOURIER : 1164.7 : 1.32 : 0.74
ASSIGNMENT : 3.9731 : 15.12 : 3.92
IDEA : 663.53 : 10.15 : 3.01
HUFFMAN : 386.55 : 10.72 : 3.42
NEURAL NET : 1.2055 : 1.94 : 0.81
LU DECOMPOSITION : 45.331 : 2.35 : 1.70
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 13.584
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.820
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU :
L2 Cache :
OS : Linux 2.6.28.10power37
C compiler : gcc version 4.2.1
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 3.276
INTEGER INDEX : 3.477
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.009
Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3, libc-5.4.38
* Trademarks are property of their respective holder.

125-700


TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 290.03 : 7.44 : 2.44
STRING SORT : 49.9 : 22.30 : 3.45
BITFIELD : 9.7657e+07 : 16.75 : 3.50
FP EMULATION : 72.36 : 34.72 : 8.01
FOURIER : 1358.8 : 1.55 : 0.87
ASSIGNMENT : 4.6748 : 17.79 : 4.61
IDEA : 782.22 : 11.96 : 3.55
HUFFMAN : 453.83 : 12.58 : 4.02
NEURAL NET : 1.407 : 2.26 : 0.95
LU DECOMPOSITION : 52.998 : 2.75 : 1.98
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 15.913
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.125
Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
==============================LINUX DATA BELOW===============================
CPU :
L2 Cache :
OS : Linux 2.6.28.10power37
C compiler : gcc version 4.2.1
libc :
MEMORY INDEX : 3.819
INTEGER INDEX : 4.088
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 1.178

and 125-805 here.

TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
: : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
--------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
NUMERIC SORT : 328.72 : 8.43 : 2.77
STRING SORT : 57.354 : 25.63 : 3.97
BITFIELD : 1.1267e+08 : 19.33 : 4.04
FP EMULATION : 82.767 : 39.72 : 9.16
FOURIER : 1561.5 : 1.78 : 1.00
ASSIGNMENT : 5.3508 : 20.36 : 5.28
IDEA : 893.57 : 13.67 : 4.06
HUFFMAN : 521.79 : 14.47 : 4.62
NEURAL NET : 1.6275 : 2.61 : 1.10
LU DECOMPOSITION : 60.656 : 3.14 : 2.27
==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK RESULTS==========================
INTEGER INDEX : 18.224
FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.443

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

I just tried the 1150 setting...but ended up with the Error opening file thing.. first time I had seen this.
fyi, I had just put on the applet for cpufreq to try, instead of using the cmd line to input the kernel-config limits cmd.

@1150 settings:

NUMERIC SORT : 469 : 12.03 : 3.95
STRING SORT : 83.067 : 37.12 : 5.74
BITFIELD : 1.5977e+08 : 27.41 : 5.72
FP EMULATION : 118.16 : 56.70 : 13.08
FOURIER : 2210.2 : 2.51 : 1.41
ASSIGNMENT : 7.5822 : 28.85 : 7.48
IDEA : 1269.4 : 19.41 : 5.76
HUFFMAN : 742.48 : 20.59 : 6.57
NEURAL NET :
CPU:NNET--error in opening file!Nokia-N900-51-1:~#

After a reboot, error went away on the slower speeds..havent tried 1150 again yet.

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

haha segmentation fault at 1GHZ, starving...
time to backup before i break something
this is cool though, thanks

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

so whats the best till now?

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

Well, titan's kernel is limited at a maximum frequency of 1150Mhz.
So there's really no way for people to go faster and get higher scores. =P

Re: Benchmarking apps for N900 - How fast is your N900?
 

I'm getting "CPU:NNET--error in opening file!Nokia-N900-51-1:~#" at 900Mhz and even at 600.
Not sure why, cause everything's working flawlessly.