| Prev |   1   2   3     4   12 | Next | Last
maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo! (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=50557)

lma 2010-04-20 11:39

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smoku (Post 619127)
I love the current Hildon/GTK+/GNOME/Freedesktop/etc. state of affairs and mourn on Qt killing this great platform.

I don't disagree, but this is really old news and done to death in another thread. At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.

HtheB 2010-04-20 11:39

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
I don't get this thread at all...

Whats the problem?

Cthulhu 2010-04-20 11:39

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
I don't know whether to laugh or cry...

viraptor 2010-04-20 11:40

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by admiral0 (Post 619175)
Welcome to 1995 boys and girls, when nobody doesn't know what oop means.

GObject introduces oop. Please use facts ;)

admiral0 2010-04-20 11:43

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by viraptor (Post 619184)
GObject introduces oop. Please use facts ;)

Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.

P.S. I wait for this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C%2B%2B0x

viraptor 2010-04-20 11:46

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by admiral0 (Post 619190)
Please don't make me laugh. GObject is like a punch in the eye. It forces oop into C where it does not belong.

Syntax does not OOP make ;) You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.

BlackDiamond 2010-04-20 11:49

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
C++0x == "The end of us all".

Lot of "modern" coders should attend classes of "old school" programming before learning oop anyway.

qwerty12 2010-04-20 11:50

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lma (Post 619179)
At least MeeGo will officially support both Qt and GTK+/Clutter.

How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written utilizing it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).

admiral0 2010-04-20 11:50

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by viraptor (Post 619194)
Syntax does not OOP make ;) You can always use Vala instead and get (mostly) the same effect.

Vala introduces yet another layer (valac) and needs bindings in a special format (vapi). Why should i shoot myself in the foot?

admiral0 2010-04-20 11:52

Re: Say NO! to Qt-based Maemo!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by qwerty12 (Post 619200)
How well supported will it be, however? "[...]Included for application compatibility" doesn't really sound "supported".

I don't dislike Qt itself nor the applications written in it, but I fail to see how it's "easier" (except for, what I can tell from my limited knowledge, making custom GUIs).

Try QT creator or Kdevelop and you'll see :)


| Prev |   1   2   3     4   12 | Next | Last
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:08.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8