![]() |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Quote:
I'm firmly on the stylus side. Fingers provide very crude accuracy, make the screen dirty and obscure what you're trying to interact with. On the other hand most of us have opposable thumbs, are trained to use them and prefer using a pen or pencil over finger painting most of the time, even (especially) when writing on a small surface like a tiny notebook, cheque or post-it note. The only UI area where fingers have an advantage over the stylus is the "pressing a button" use case (like when dialing a phone number), but in those cases actual physical buttons would be much better anyway. |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Long live the stylus! As long as I need to click on that tiny 'fullscreen' icon on websites, stylus would be my first choice rather than a finger.
|
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Hybrid touchscreens are the best of both worlds. They have a capacitive layer over resistive layer, or vice versa. Most manufacturers are just too cheap to implement them.
|
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Quote:
Quote:
But it depends on how it is being measured. In amount of bits, digital still and video cameras probably take the lead. And for capacitive screens, one can always use the sausage to cure the lack of stylus. |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Quote:
I want that choice. Hell i dont care if the device comes without a stylus but i want a slot where it can be stored easily. I'll pay the extra couple of pounds to buy one. but its no use if there no where to store it. Basically put im never gonna buy a device without a stylus so why lose my sale. no one is forcing others to use it but give me the choice. |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Quote:
Especially as i often use my phone over lunch at work. somtimes very messy hand. Using my stylus gets my basic plastic low cost stylus in a mess as opposed to curry etc all over my complex expensive phone. There are many times and people for whom stylus free is just perfect. Ive got no gripe with that. Apples problem is they decide that their narrow view of a Stylus that should never be needed or wanted is the only view and use there fantastic marketing to persuade people that there view is the correct one and the only sane one. Refusing to accept that other may choose to differ and are not mad for doing so |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Quote:
|
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
@benny:
I almost never use my iphone 2 handed, except when I need to type something quickly (or playing games). Otherwise I can type with 1 hand (thumb) on it too. I think only newbies use iphone the way as they show it in the tutorials (one hand holding, the other pointing). @juise: the sausage (or the similar ones) suck. It just changes your movement to be similar as you would with a pen, without any added precision. I do have the Pogo sketch stylus. random replies: 3.5" is too small for writing |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
@benny I also never use my iPhone with two hands. Hold in palm, use thumb, flick as needed with thumb. I can do that, while traveling and holding something in my other hand... much like I tend to do.
I had to pull out my N810 on my last trip, then the stylus... and I was using both hands unable to hold my bag, so I had to set that on the floor while on an airport shuttle. It made for an awkward time, but I needed to get where the heck I had parked quickly. While both styles have merits, I tend to use my iPhone for quick stuff with one hand - contacts, dialing, answering, notes, looking up stuff, browser... one handed. |
Re: Why the stylus isn’t dead
Well I noticed one really important use case yesterday. Was having some coffee and eating a donut. Not that good to use the phone with sticky fingers, but stylus works great. I just need to wipe my stylus not the whole phone :)
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 22:27. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8