![]() |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
Also lets face it, phones from 2003 weren't technologically capable enough for video-calling, Snapdragon, A4 and Cortex phones today are |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
Re: iPhone 4
I can already see what will be the main feature for Iphone 5. You will only be able to call to other iphones. All the bad apples will cheer while apple takes away their freedom. :D
|
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
geez, just think about it for a minute. nokia is way bigger than just the midrange american smartphone market just like ford is way bigger than the american midsize sedan market. do you really think nokia would make more money if they only made one phone? |
Re: iPhone 4
Can i vote for how important freedom and openess are.. as apposed to appstores and ecosystems?
|
Re: iPhone 4
On the three network in the UK in 2003, video calls over 3g were the same value as voice calls for the introductory first year. I had 900 mins a month of these and it worked fine.
It was pretty good and I used it a bit but many times you didn't want people to know where you were (people will force you to use it if they know you have it)!! And then they charged extra for the service and I didn't really miss it. |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
Funny thing is, they'd have probably been content with WVGA like everyone else otherwise -- odd that a loathsome combination of decisions (pathetic resolution, strongly resolution-dependent design) ultimately pushed them to introduce a better screen than everyone else. But FWIW, I want that screen in a Meego phone so I can cram bigger desktop apps into it. :p Maybe keep the capacitive touch and add an active digitizer -- I could certainly use cursor-on-hover for that PPI. |
Re: iPhone 4
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8