![]() |
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quote:
How do you realistically use a compass? I watch it as I go around, and it takes me 20 seconds to make a corner on foot, for a larger corner, not running. I feel this to be realistic enough. Also, in a car, you can leave it in place and turn. Minding pedestrians, it's still a few seconds, more if yielding. I feel this to be more realistic than shake before use. |
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
an electronic magnetometer don't got inertia, it always "point" north no matter how you shake or spin it
|
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quote:
Quote:
------------- Quote:
|
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quite frankly, there's just too much ignorance flying around this thread. Some of us could explain how GPS, 3D accelerometers, magnetometers and clocks work, but then we'd have to kill you.
|
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
well, north could change locally, but the magnetometer points to it
i can't picture a way you would be able to shield a regular compass from a close magnet, EM radiation, sure, but not plain magnetic field, though if the magnetic field is always at an exact offset from the magnetometer, you can calibrate it to ignore it (that way you can get rid of issues with speaker magnets etc, but depending on the wiring, it might still go crazy when the bass go bumping) |
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quick reply about holography...
Research into holographic displays has produced devices which are able to create a light field identical to that which would emanate from the original scene, with both horizontal and vertical parallax across a large range of viewing angles. The effect is similar to looking through a window at the scene being reproduced; this may make Computer-Generated Holography the most convincing of the 3D display technologies, but as yet the large amounts of calculation required to generate a detailed hologram largely prevent its application outside of the laboratory. Some companies do produce holographic imaging equipment commercially. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_imaging http://www.zebraimaging.com/products/motion-displays |
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
lightfield displays (true displays, not "hardcopy" holograms) require lots of processing for anything not pre-recorded, and still quite a bit for prerecorded stuff, due to the simple fact there is so much more information to be displayed at once
btw, i don't have a link at hand, but there is research being done on tactile feedback from virtual 3d environments in free air, somthing about focused ultrasound i think and on a slightly more fictional note, it was Sony i think, they have a patent for a method of stimulating arbitrary neurons with transcranial focused ultrasound pulses, it's only on paper though, no experiments nor anything have been done |
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quote:
|
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quote:
|
Re: Do you know of any upcoming commercial physical hardware limitations for the n900 devices that may limit it's life?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8