|
Page 12 of 14 |
|
Prev |
2 10 11 12
13 14
|
Next
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
I smell incredible amount of bias... resulting in an incredible amount of leniency toward the un-open natures exhibited by Nokia/Fabien.
Or should this be the normal level of tolerance we should show toward each other and our topics of choice? That would be nice too. |
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, i don't do this for donations and i never expected to get a significant amount of them. But fact is: The donations you receive for over 100.000 downloads doesn't allow you to pay a single romantic dinner with your wife. So don't tell anyone wanting to sell his app to go for donations instead. There basically are no donations in the maemo world. I received far more and bigger donations for my other far less popular projects. |
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
As weird as it may sound, the issue is deeper than 'just' licensing. It puts maemo.org Extras on collision course with Ovi (I can't emphasize how bad that is), and risk bad blood between Fabien/Stellarium project and the maemo/stellarium communities (which, reading back the thread has already happened to an extent). The 25.000$ donation/prize from Nokia is not helping clarify the issue, either.
|
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Quote:
The person who could force you to stand on your head, eat the burger and read the source code aloud is the one you received the application from. He gave it to you under these terms and conditions. It's up to him to enforce them. Those who actually received a copy of the application from you can enforce that you give them what the license grants them (like: full source), but they can't make you do things that don't affect their own rights (like: give the source to others). So if we assume there's Fabien, Nokia (=Ovi Store) and some anonymous contributor (call him A.C.) who wrote GPLed code for Stellarium: A.C. can request of Fabien that he should offer to publish the sources to "any third party". The same is true vor Fabien vs Nokia. But I cannot request Nokia make the sources available to my neighbours and friends as "third parties". I can only ask Nokia customer service to send me the sources, knowing I'll have the right to distribute them afterwards. (Same as with other parts of the GPL that the Ovi Store clearly violates, but nobody but Fabien and his co-authors can force them to do.) Again, it all comes down to: Will Nokia distribute the sources upon request? We'll soon know. Meanwhile, we must give them the benefit of the doubt - even if it's Nokia. |
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
I'm not sure you've got the hang of this yet. Let me try and clarify it further.
As I understand it, Ovi Store can't legally distribute GPLv2 binaries without providing the source or providing a written offer to provide the source. If they provide the source directly to recipients of the binary, their obligations are fullfilled. If they don't then the written offer they must provide applies to anyone, not only recipients of the binary, and this applies for 3 years after they stop distributing the binary. If they don't satisfy these obligations, then they have no licence to distribute the binaries. Ceasing distribution doesn't nullify their prior breach of copyright law though and still leaves them vulnerable. The only people who can enforce the obligation by suing Ovi Store are any of the copyright holders of the GPL'd code. It's also my understanding that the GPL (v2) provides only freedoms to me as a recipient of such code, not obligations unless I choose to distribute it or derivatives of it. |
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Just to help summarize: One is a matter of legality, the other is a matter of enforcement. I believe fnordianslip is trying to ask for clarify on the legality, not on the enforcement.
|
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Sooooo... Is this the 'opensource' that's in everyone's mind when they publicly profess their FOSS love? When they scorn Google for their perversion of GPL?
|
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
I give out candy scorn to kids on Halloween.
|
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Quote:
Code:
16. Open Source Software |
Re: On the massive success of the Nokia Innovators contest at bringing us quality N900 software
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:07. |
Page 12 of 14 |
|
Prev |
2 10 11 12
13 14
|
Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8