![]() |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Code:
sudo gainroot |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Second, we could probably run through some concepts of how this could be implemented to support a standard while not making the device almost impossible to use or losing existing features (such as ability to access "MyDocs" from PCs without requiring software that might not be present on most PCs) |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Code:
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Easiest thing for an user to do is to set up home dir (or full disk) encryption. Both should be within reach, however will require some hacking. Strict device lock policy is also necessary, so that an average attacker is forced to clear the RAM (and the enc. key) as his first move. For OP, if you want security standards compliance, go with a security standards certified device. N900 is not one, and won't become one with a software update. I'm quite sure e-mail local storage isn't the only area where security fails. |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
No, really, how do you do it without access to the device? (Edit: OK, we're probably talking about different things, I meant the naive way where the GUI == app) And how do you do it with access to a LOCKED device? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Trying to make it more clear, that my assumption was that either: (a) The attacker has access to device that has no key material in RAM (i.e. the e-mail app was closed before he got access). (b) The attacker has access to device that has key material in RAM, but that is locked (the HDE/FDE case WITH automatic locking). |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
e: I mainly referred to the fact that giving physical access to someone might end things up in a way that there is a script running as root, grabbing data and uploading it to server x. even when you have million industry standards, things doesn't change a bit. |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In Harmattan, with access to the hardware TPM (but only in "closed" mode), the situation will be different but for Maemo as it stands I don't see any good solutions. |
Re: Why Cached mail is not encrypted on the N900 device???
Quote:
This isn't the huge security flaw that you feel it is. Really, it's not. There comes a point where you need to decrypt your email to read it obviously, and to do this you need a key that has to be difficult to brute force - so ask yourself, are you really going to type in 64+ characters or whatever your pass phrase happens to be, every time you want email? It's the only way - otherwise you leave yourself open to key recovery via RAM, swap, or storage. It's much easier to beef up your physical security than worry so much about email. Alternatively you could just go web based and keep your mail server locked in a concrete box in your basement... |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8